mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Finding the Translation Switch: Discovering and Exploiting the Task-Initiation Features in LLMs

arXiv 2601.11019 ↗First posted 16 Jan 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently exhibit strong translation abilities, even without task-specific fine-tuning. However, the internal mechanisms governing this innate capability remain largely opaque. To demystify this process, we leverage Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) and introduce a novel framework for identifying task-specific features. Our method first recalls features that are frequently co-activated on translation inputs and then filters them for functional coherence using a PCA-based consistency metric. This framework successfully isolates a small set of **translation initiation** features. Causal interventions demonstrate that amplifying these features steers the model towards correct translation, while ablating them induces hallucinations and off-task outputs, confirming they represent a core component of the model's innate translation competency. Moving from analysis to application, we leverage this mechanistic insight to propose a new data selection strategy for efficient fine-tuning. Specifically, we prioritize training on **mechanistically hard** samples-those that fail to naturally activate the translation initiation features. Experiments show this approach significantly improves data efficiency and suppresses hallucinations. Furthermore, we find these mechanisms are transferable to larger models of the same family. Our work not only decodes a core component of the translation mechanism in LLMs but also provides a blueprint for using internal model mechanism to create more robust and efficient models. The codes are available at https://github.com/flamewei123/AAAI26-translation-Initiation-Features.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2026.

Builds on

18 of 35 references.

References · 18

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  3. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  4. 2023Large Language Modelscited by 774
  5. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
  6. 2023How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 344
  7. 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 328
  8. 2023Prompting Large Language Model for Machine Translation: A Case Studycited by 247
  9. 2023Large Language Model Alignment: A Surveycited by 241
  10. 2023Finding Alignments Between Interpretable Causal Variables and Distributed Neural Representationscited by 197
  11. 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 186
  12. 2024Do I Know This Entity? Knowledge Awareness and Hallucinations in Language Modelscited by 114
6 more
  1. 2023Task Contamination: Language Models May Not Be Few-Shot Anymorecited by 98
  2. 2024A Survey on Data Selection for LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 76
  3. 2024Applying sparse autoencoders to unlearn knowledge in language modelscited by 58
  4. 2024Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Domain-specific Machine Translationcited by 43
  5. 2024The Fine-Tuning Paradox: Boosting Translation Quality Without Sacrificing LLM Abilitiescited by 22
  6. 2024Should We Really Edit Language Models? On the Evaluation of Edited Language Modelscited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.