mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Don't Forget It! Conditional Sparse Autoencoder Clamping Works for Unlearning

arXiv 2503.11127 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 6

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Recent developments in Large Language Model (LLM) capabilities have brought great potential but also posed new risks. For example, LLMs with knowledge of bioweapons, advanced chemistry, or cyberattacks could cause violence if placed in the wrong hands or during malfunctions. Because of their nature as near-black boxes, intuitive interpretation of LLM internals remains an open research question, preventing developers from easily controlling model behavior and capabilities. The use of Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) has recently emerged as a potential method of unraveling representations of concepts in LLMs internals, and has allowed developers to steer model outputs by directly modifying the hidden activations. In this paper, we use SAEs to identify unwanted concepts from the Weapons of Mass Destruction Proxy (WMDP) dataset within gemma-2-2b internals and use feature steering to reduce the model's ability to answer harmful questions while retaining its performance on harmless queries. Our results bring back optimism to the viability of SAE-based explicit knowledge unlearning techniques.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 10 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2025.

Builds on

10 of 19 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Applying sparse autoencoders to unlearn knowledge in language models25 Oct
  2. 2021Adaptive Machine Unlearning8 Jun

Other references · 8

  1. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  2. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  3. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  4. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
  5. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,061
  6. 2023NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Railscited by 365
  7. 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 334
  8. 2023Ethical Reasoning over Moral Alignment: A Case and Framework for In-Context Ethical Policies in LLMscited by 64

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025CRISP: Persistent Concept Unlearning via Sparse Autoencoders
  2. 2025Interpreting and Steering LLMs with Mutual Information-based Explanations on Sparse Autoencoders
  3. 2025Sparse-Autoencoder-Guided Internal Representation Unlearning for Large Language Models
  4. 2025Sparse Autoencoder Features for Classifications and Transferability
  5. 2025A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Models
  6. 2024CodeUnlearn: Amortized Zero-Shot Machine Unlearning in Language Models Using Discrete Concept
  7. 2025Sparse Shift Autoencoders for Identifying Concepts from Large Language Model Activations
  8. 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probing