mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Test Time Adaptation Methods for Point Cloud Registration in Laparoscopic Surgery

arXiv 2608.02883 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

3D point cloud registration in laparoscopic surgery estimates the transformation between an intraoperative organ reconstructed from video and its preoperative mesh. Because ground-truth transformations are unavailable for real data, supervised networks are trained on synthetic organ pairs. At test time, real reconstructions differ from synthetic data and are noisy, sparse, and occluded, which degrades correspondence estimation. Test-time adaptation (TTA) can reduce this domain shift, but existing methods mainly rely on logits, entropy, class prototypes, or cache memories unavailable in registration. Registration also involves paired inputs with an asymmetric shift that primarily affects the intraoperative cloud. We analyse and modify state-of-the-art TTA methods from three families to 3D registration: model, normalization, and input adaptation. We analyze four representative approaches based on auxiliary-task model updates, backpropagation-free token purging, feature alignment, and layer-normalization calibration. We modify them to handle asymmetric shifts between preoperative and intraoperative point clouds and replace classification-based entropy objectives. Using a correspondence-based model trained on clean synthetic source data, we evaluate adaptation to corrupted synthetic and real target data on P2P and P2ILReg. For synthetic targets, we apply eight corruptions, including uniform noise and global density reduction, at five severity levels. All methods improve registration on P2P, whereas on P2ILReg only input adaptation reduces the error, while normalization adaptation degrades it. Considering the computational overhead of backpropagation-based adaptation, input adaptation is the most promising option for laparoscopic surgery, providing low inference latency and consistent error reductions across datasets. Code: https://github.com/ninaa-git/survey_pc_registration_tta

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.

Builds on

35 of 43 references.

References · 35

  1. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  2. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,586
  3. 2022Masked Autoencoders for Point Cloud Self-supervised Learningcited by 456
  4. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 353
  5. 2022NOTE: Robust Continual Test-time Adaptation Against Temporal Correlationcited by 150
  6. 2021Density-aware Chamfer Distance as a Comprehensive Metric for Point Cloud Completioncited by 111
  7. 2022Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 79
  8. 2022Benchmarking Robustness of 3D Point Cloud Recognition Against Common Corruptionscited by 78
  9. 2024Beyond Model Adaptation at Test Time: A Surveycited by 55
  10. 2021MixNorm: Test-Time Adaptation Through Online Normalization Estimationcited by 47
  11. 2022GIPSO: Geometrically Informed Propagation for Online Adaptation in 3D LiDAR Segmentationcited by 35
  12. 2021Efficient Test Time Adapter Ensembling for Low-resource Language Varietiescited by 26
23 more
  1. 2022Robustifying Vision Transformer without Retraining from Scratch by Test-Time Class-Conditional Feature Alignmentcited by 26
  2. 2023Point-TTA: Test-Time Adaptation for Point Cloud Registration Using Multitask Meta-Auxiliary Learningcited by 23
  3. 2024PARE-Net: Position-Aware Rotation-Equivariant Networks for Robust Point Cloud Registrationcited by 18
  4. 2022Domain-Specific Risk Minimization for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 15
  5. 2024Backpropagation-free Network for 3D Test-time Adaptationcited by 14
  6. 2020Tailoring: encoding inductive biases by optimizing unsupervised objectives at prediction timecited by 13
  7. 2022Learning Feature Descriptors for Pre- and Intra-operative Point Cloud Matching for Laparoscopic Liver Registrationcited by 12
  8. 2024CloudFixer: Test-Time Adaptation for 3D Point Clouds via Diffusion-Guided Geometric Transformationcited by 11
  9. 2024PCoTTA: Continual Test-Time Adaptation for Multi-Task Point Cloud Understandingcited by 11
  10. 2024Source-Free Domain Adaptation of Weakly-Supervised Object Localization Models for Histologycited by 9
  11. 2025Personalized Feature Translation for Expression Recognition: An Efficient Source-Free Domain Adaptation Methodcited by 8
  12. 2024Test-Time Adaptation in Point Clouds: Leveraging Sampling Variation with Weight Averagingcited by 7
  13. 2024Test-Time Adaptation of 3D Point Clouds via Denoising Diffusion Modelscited by 7
  14. 2025Landmark-Free Preoperative-to-Intraoperative Registration in Laparoscopic Liver Resectioncited by 7
  15. 2024Deep Learning-Based Point Cloud Registration: A Comprehensive Survey and Taxonomycited by 5
  16. 2024Resolving the Ambiguity of Complete-to-Partial Point Cloud Registration for Image-Guided Liver Surgery with Patches-to-Partial Matchingcited by 4
  17. 2025Point-Cache: Test-time Dynamic and Hierarchical Cache for Robust and Generalizable Point Cloud Analysiscited by 4
  18. 2025SMART-PC: Skeletal Model Adaptation for Robust Test-Time Training in Point Cloudscited by 4
  19. 2025PointMAC: Meta-Learned Adaptation for Robust Test-Time Point Cloud Completioncited by 4
  20. 2025Purge-Gate: Backpropagation-Free Test-Time Adaptation for Point Clouds Classification via Token Purgingcited by 3
  21. 20243D Registration in 30 Years: A Surveycited by 2
  22. 2025APCoTTA: Continual Test-Time Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation of Airborne LiDAR Point Cloudscited by 2
  23. 20253D Test-time Adaptation via Graph Spectral Driven Point Shiftcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.