mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Performance Estimation in Binary Classification Using Calibrated Confidence

arXiv 2505.05295 ↗First posted 8 May 2025cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Model monitoring is a critical component of the machine learning lifecycle, safeguarding against undetected drops in the model's performance after deployment. Traditionally, performance monitoring has required access to ground truth labels, which are not always readily available. This can result in unacceptable latency or render performance monitoring altogether impossible. Recently, methods designed to estimate the accuracy of classifier models without access to labels have shown promising results. However, there are various other metrics that might be more suitable for assessing model performance in many cases. Until now, none of these important metrics has received similar interest from the scientific community. In this work, we address this gap by presenting CBPE, a novel method that can estimate any binary classification metric defined using the confusion matrix. In particular, we choose four metrics from this large family: accuracy, precision, recall, and F1, to demonstrate our method. CBPE treats the elements of the confusion matrix as random variables and leverages calibrated confidence scores of the model to estimate their distributions. The desired metric is then also treated as a random variable, whose full probability distribution can be derived from the estimated confusion matrix. CBPE is shown to produce estimates that come with strong theoretical guarantees and valid confidence intervals.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2025.

Builds on

20 of 29 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  2. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
  3. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
  4. 2019Measuring Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 446
  5. 2019Evaluating model calibration in classificationcited by 168
  6. 2022Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performancecited by 145
  7. 2021Assessing Generalization of SGD via Disagreementcited by 117
  8. 2021Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributionscited by 116
  9. 2022Agreement-on-the-Line: Predicting the Performance of Neural Networks under Distribution Shiftcited by 94
  10. 2021To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labelscited by 70
  11. 2023Benchmarking Distribution Shift in Tabular Data with TableShiftcited by 66
  12. 2021Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shiftcited by 55
8 more
  1. 2021Detecting Errors and Estimating Accuracy on Unlabeled Data with Self-training Ensemblescited by 54
  2. 2021Estimating Expected Calibration Errorscited by 24
  3. 2023Confidence and Dispersity Speak: Characterising Prediction Matrix for Unsupervised Accuracy Estimationcited by 22
  4. 2023Characterizing Out-of-Distribution Error via Optimal Transportcited by 20
  5. 2021Rethinking Importance Weighting for Transfer Learningcited by 11
  6. 2024Confidence-based Estimators for Predictive Performance in Model Monitoringcited by 8
  7. 2023Estimating calibration error under label shift without labelscited by 2
  8. 2024Contrastive Conditional Alignment based on Label Shift Calibration for Imbalanced Domain Adaptationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.