mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LookAlike: Consistent Distractor Generation in Math MCQs

arXiv 2505.01903 ↗First posted 3 May 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 7

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Process reward models for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate distractors for multiple-choice questions (MCQs), especially in domains like math education. However, existing approaches are limited in ensuring that the generated distractors are consistent with common student errors. We propose LookAlike, a method that improves error-distractor consistency via preference optimization. Our two main innovations are: (a) mining synthetic preference pairs from model inconsistencies, and (b) alternating supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to stabilize training. Unlike prior work that relies on heuristics or manually annotated preference data, LookAlike uses its own generation inconsistencies as dispreferred samples, thus enabling scalable and stable training. Evaluated on a real-world dataset of 1,400+ math MCQs, LookAlike achieves 51.6% accuracy in distractor generation and 57.2% in error generation under LLM-as-a-judge evaluation, outperforming an existing state-of-the-art method (45.6% / 47.7%). These improvements highlight the effectiveness of preference-based regularization and inconsistency mining for generating consistent math MCQ distractors at scale.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 29 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2025.

Builds on

29 of 53 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Improving Socratic Question Generation using Data Augmentation and Preference Optimization1 Mar

Other references · 28

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  5. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  6. 2016Diverse Beam Search: Decoding Diverse Solutions from Neural Sequence Modelscited by 301
  7. 2024Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Studycited by 262
  8. 2024Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positivecited by 241
  9. 2024Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Surveycited by 205
  10. 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 196
  11. 2024Benchmarking Complex Instruction-Following with Multiple Constraints Compositioncited by 152
  12. 2024Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizercited by 109
16 more
  1. 2025Training LLM-based Tutors to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Dialoguescited by 43
  2. 2024Multi-Task Inference: Can Large Language Models Follow Multiple Instructions at Once?cited by 30
  3. 2024Do LLMs estimate uncertainty well in instruction-following?cited by 26
  4. 2024Distractor Generation in Multiple-Choice Tasks: A Survey of Methods, Datasets, and Evaluationcited by 25
  5. 2020Knowledge-Driven Distractor Generation for Cloze-style Multiple Choice Questionscited by 24
  6. 20243D-Properties: Identifying Challenges in DPO and Charting a Path Forwardcited by 24
  7. 2020A BERT-based Distractor Generation Scheme with Multi-tasking and Negative Answer Training Strategiescited by 22
  8. 2024The SIFo Benchmark: Investigating the Sequential Instruction Following Ability of Large Language Modelscited by 18
  9. 2024ProcBench: Benchmark for Multi-Step Reasoning and Following Procedurecited by 13
  10. 2023Learning Multi-Step Reasoning by Solving Arithmetic Taskscited by 12
  11. 2024Improving Automated Distractor Generation for Math Multiple-choice Questions with Overgenerate-and-rankcited by 12
  12. 2024Enhancing Distractor Generation for Multiple-Choice Questions with Retrieval Augmented Pretraining and Knowledge Graph Integrationcited by 11
  13. 2024MalAlgoQA: Pedagogical Evaluation of Counterfactual Reasoning in Large Language Models and Implications for AI in Educationcited by 8
  14. 2025Generating Plausible Distractors for Multiple-Choice Questions via Student Choice Predictioncited by 8
  15. 2024SEE-DPO: Self Entropy Enhanced Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 7
  16. 2024Does Multiple Choice Have a Future in the Age of Generative AI? A Posttest-only RCTcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Can LLMs Model Incorrect Student Reasoning? A Case Study on Distractor Generation
  2. 2026Beyond Fine-Tuning: In-Context Learning and Chain-of-Thought for Reasoned Distractor Generation
  3. 2025Do LLMs Make Mistakes Like Students? Exploring Natural Alignment between Language Models and Human Error Patterns
  4. 2023Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Context
  5. 2026DAGGER: Distractor-Aware Graph Generation for Executable Reasoning in Math Problems
  6. 2026DIAG: Diagnostic Iterative Alignment and Generation for Data-Efficient Mathematical Preference Distillation
  7. 2026Towards Pedagogically Aligned LLM Tutors for Math Mistake Remediation
  8. 2025Reasoning and Sampling-Augmented MCQ Difficulty Prediction via LLMs