mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The SIFo Benchmark: Investigating the Sequential Instruction Following Ability of Large Language Models

arXiv 2406.19999 ↗First posted 28 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Following multiple instructions is a crucial ability for large language models (LLMs). Evaluating this ability comes with significant challenges: (i) limited coherence between multiple instructions, (ii) positional bias where the order of instructions affects model performance, and (iii) a lack of objectively verifiable tasks. To address these issues, we introduce a benchmark designed to evaluate models' abilities to follow multiple instructions through sequential instruction following (SIFo) tasks. In SIFo, the successful completion of multiple instructions is verifiable by examining only the final instruction. Our benchmark evaluates instruction following using four tasks (text modification, question answering, mathematics, and security rules), each assessing different aspects of sequential instruction following. Our evaluation of popular LLMs, both closed-source and open-source, shows that more recent and larger models significantly outperform their older and smaller counterparts on the SIFo tasks, validating the benchmark's effectiveness. All models struggle with following sequences of instructions, hinting at an important lack of robustness of today's language models.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2024.

Builds on

27 of 39 references.

References · 27

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  5. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  6. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  7. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  8. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  9. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
  10. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  11. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,470
  12. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
15 more
  1. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
  2. 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 743
  3. 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 699
  4. 2023Large Language Models Sensitivity to The Order of Options in Multiple-Choice Questionscited by 263
  5. 2023Cross-Lingual Consistency of Factual Knowledge in Multilingual Language Modelscited by 118
  6. 2023Controlled Text Generation with Natural Language Instructionscited by 87
  7. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models on Controlled Generation Taskscited by 73
  8. 2023Can Large Language Models Understand Real-World Complex Instructions?cited by 69
  9. 2023Large Language Models are Diverse Role-Players for Summarization Evaluationcited by 62
  10. 2023Positional Description Matters for Transformers Arithmeticcited by 56
  11. 2023Can LLMs Follow Simple Rules?cited by 46
  12. 2024Multi-Task Inference: Can Large Language Models Follow Multiple Instructions at Once?cited by 30
  13. 2024Benchmarking Large Language Models on Controllable Generation under Diversified Instructionscited by 27
  14. 2024Fine-tuning Large Language Models with Sequential Instructionscited by 20
  15. 2023Towards Better Evaluation of Instruction-Following: A Case-Study in Summarizationcited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 10; 2026: 6.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Lost at the Beginning of Reasoningcited by 15
  2. 2025Order Matters: Investigate the Position Bias in Multi-constraint Instruction Followingcited by 12
  3. 2025EIFBENCH: Extremely Complex Instruction Following Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 9
  4. 2025One Battle After Another: Probing LLMs' Limits on Multi-Turn Instruction Following with a Benchmark Evolving Frameworkcited by 9
  5. 2024MMMT-IF: A Challenging Multimodal Multi-Turn Instruction Following Benchmarkcited by 8
  6. 2025LookAlike: Consistent Distractor Generation in Math MCQscited by 7
  7. 2025TeXpert: A Multi-Level Benchmark for Evaluating LaTeX Code Generation by LLMscited by 7
  8. 2024Compound-QA: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Compound Questionscited by 5
  9. 2025PICACO: Pluralistic In-Context Value Alignment of LLMs via Total Correlation Optimizationcited by 3
  10. 2025RefuteBench 2.0 -- Agentic Benchmark for Dynamic Evaluation of LLM Responses to Refutation Instructioncited by 2
  11. 2026Can Small Agents Collaborate to Beat a Single Large Language Model?cited by 1
  12. 2026RIFT: Reordered Instruction Following Testbed To Evaluate Instruction Following in Singular Multistep Prompt Structurescited by 1
6 more
  1. 2026Spatial Reasoning in LLM Game Agents: Impact of Causal Context and Multi-Step Planningcited by 1
  2. 2025The Atomic Instruction Gap: Instruction-Tuned LLMs Struggle with Simple, Self-Contained Directivescited by 0
  3. 2025Financial Instruction Following Evaluation (FIFE)cited by 0
  4. 2026Task Competence Is Not Instruction Following: Evaluating Instruction-Conflicting Behavior in Small Language Modelscited by 0
  5. 2026ArbiGraph: Arbitrarily Scalable Verifiable Task Graphs for Evaluating Context Managementcited by 0
  6. 2026Video-IFBench: Evaluating Instruction Following of Multimodal LLMs in Video Understanding Scenarioscited by 0