mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ProcBench: Benchmark for Multi-Step Reasoning and Following Procedure

arXiv 2410.03117 ↗First posted 4 Oct 2024cs.AI cs.CL cs.LGcited by 12

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Reasoning is central to a wide range of intellectual activities, and while the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) continue to advance, their performance in reasoning tasks remains limited. The processes and mechanisms underlying reasoning are not yet fully understood, but key elements include path exploration, selection of relevant knowledge, and multi-step inference. Problems are solved through the synthesis of these components. In this paper, we propose a benchmark that focuses on a specific aspect of reasoning ability: the direct evaluation of multi-step inference. To this end, we design a special reasoning task where multi-step inference is specifically focused by largely eliminating path exploration and implicit knowledge utilization. Our dataset comprises pairs of explicit instructions and corresponding questions, where the procedures necessary for solving the questions are entirely detailed within the instructions. This setup allows models to solve problems solely by following the provided directives. By constructing problems that require varying numbers of steps to solve and evaluating responses at each step, we enable a thorough assessment of state-of-the-art LLMs' ability to follow instructions. To ensure the robustness of our evaluation, we include multiple distinct tasks. Furthermore, by comparing accuracy across tasks, utilizing step-aware metrics, and applying separately defined measures of complexity, we conduct experiments that offer insights into the capabilities and limitations of LLMs in reasoning tasks. Our findings have significant implications for the development of LLMs and highlight areas for future research in advancing their reasoning abilities. Our dataset is available at urlhttps://huggingface.co/datasets/ifujisawa/procbench and code at urlhttps://github.com/ifujisawa/proc-bench.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 4 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Oct 2024.

Builds on

4 of 39 references.

References · 4

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  2. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 1,906
  3. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
  4. 2023MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Modelscited by 724

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 8; 2026: 4.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025TurnBench-MS: A Benchmark for Evaluating Multi-Turn, Multi-Step Reasoning in Large Language Models
  2. 2026Opening the Black Box: A Survey on the Mechanisms of Multi-Step Reasoning in Large Language Models
  3. 2026EvalQReason: A Framework for Step-Level Reasoning Evaluation in Large Language Models
  4. 2024LogicBench: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models
  5. 2023Chain-of-Thought Hub: A Continuous Effort to Measure Large Language Models' Reasoning Performance
  6. 2024Multi-LogiEval: Towards Evaluating Multi-Step Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models
  7. 2025Evaluating Step-by-step Reasoning Traces: A Survey
  8. 2023ART: Automatic multi-step reasoning and tool-use for large language models