mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ZKPROV: A Zero-Knowledge Approach to Dataset Provenance for Large Language Models

arXiv 2506.20915 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2025cs.CR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As large language models (LLMs) are used in sensitive fields, accurately verifying their computational provenance without disclosing their training datasets poses a significant challenge, particularly in regulated sectors such as healthcare, which have strict requirements for dataset use. Traditional approaches either incur substantial computational cost to fully verify the entire training process or leak unauthorized information to the verifier. Therefore, we introduce ZKPROV, a novel cryptographic framework allowing users to verify that the LLM's responses to their prompts are trained on datasets certified by the authorities that own them. Additionally, it ensures that the dataset's content is relevant to the users' queries without revealing sensitive information about the datasets or the model parameters. ZKPROV offers a unique balance between privacy and efficiency by binding training datasets, model parameters, and responses, while also attaching zero-knowledge proofs to the responses generated by the LLM to validate these claims. Our experimental results demonstrate sublinear scaling for generating and verifying these proofs, with end-to-end overhead under 3.3 seconds for models up to 8B parameters, presenting a practical solution for real-world applications. We also provide formal security guarantees, proving that our approach preserves dataset confidentiality while ensuring trustworthy dataset provenance.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2025.

Builds on

17 of 48 references.

References · 17

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  3. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
  4. 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,288
  5. 2025Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey on Agentic RAGcited by 249
  6. 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 207
  7. 2018Slalom: Fast, Verifiable and Private Execution of Neural Networks in Trusted Hardwarecited by 102
  8. 2024Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Surveycited by 83
  9. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Evolution, Current Landscape and Future Directionscited by 70
  10. 2024zkLLM: Zero Knowledge Proofs for Large Language Modelscited by 51
  11. 2022Scaling up Trustless DNN Inference with Zero-Knowledge Proofscited by 31
  12. 2019VeriML: Enabling Integrity Assurances and Fair Payments for Machine Learning as a Servicecited by 28
5 more
  1. 2024Data Authenticity, Consent, & Provenance for AI are all broken: what will it take to fix them?cited by 15
  2. 2025TeleSparse: Practical Privacy-Preserving Verification of Deep Neural Networkscited by 9
  3. 2024Topic-Based Watermarks for Large Language Modelscited by 8
  4. 2021Preventing Machine Learning Poisoning Attacks Using Authentication and Provenancecited by 5
  5. 2025The Feasibility of Topic-Based Watermarking on Academic Peer Reviewscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.