mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CipherBank: Exploring the Boundary of LLM Reasoning Capabilities through Cryptography Challenges

arXiv 2504.19093 ↗First posted 27 Apr 2025cs.CR cs.AI cs.PFcited by 11

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, especially the recent advancements in reasoning, such as o1 and o3, pushing the boundaries of AI. Despite these impressive achievements in mathematics and coding, the reasoning abilities of LLMs in domains requiring cryptographic expertise remain underexplored. In this paper, we introduce CipherBank, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of LLMs in cryptographic decryption tasks. CipherBank comprises 2,358 meticulously crafted problems, covering 262 unique plaintexts across 5 domains and 14 subdomains, with a focus on privacy-sensitive and real-world scenarios that necessitate encryption. From a cryptographic perspective, CipherBank incorporates 3 major categories of encryption methods, spanning 9 distinct algorithms, ranging from classical ciphers to custom cryptographic techniques. We evaluate state-of-the-art LLMs on CipherBank, e.g., GPT-4o, DeepSeek-V3, and cutting-edge reasoning-focused models such as o1 and DeepSeek-R1. Our results reveal significant gaps in reasoning abilities not only between general-purpose chat LLMs and reasoning-focused LLMs but also in the performance of current reasoning-focused models when applied to classical cryptographic decryption tasks, highlighting the challenges these models face in understanding and manipulating encrypted data. Through detailed analysis and error investigations, we provide several key observations that shed light on the limitations and potential improvement areas for LLMs in cryptographic reasoning. These findings underscore the need for continuous advancements in LLM reasoning capabilities.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 32 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2025.

Builds on

32 of 55 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024OpenAI o1 System Card21 Dec
  2. 2024When "Competency" in Reasoning Opens the Door to Vulnerability: Jailbreaking LLMs via Novel Complex Ciphers16 Feb

Other references · 30

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  3. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  4. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  5. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
  6. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
  7. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  8. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
  9. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
  10. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  11. 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,785
  12. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
18 more
  1. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
  2. 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Reportcited by 724
  3. 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 527
  4. 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Ciphercited by 401
  5. 2023Low-Resource Languages Jailbreak GPT-4cited by 290
  6. 2024Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning: Progresses and Challengescited by 283
  7. 2024LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM Benchmarkcited by 242
  8. 2022FOLIO: Natural Language Reasoning with First-Order Logiccited by 233
  9. 2024ArtPrompt: ASCII Art-based Jailbreak Attacks against Aligned LLMscited by 197
  10. 2024Debug like a Human: A Large Language Model Debugger via Verifying Runtime Execution Step-by-stepcited by 123
  11. 2024MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmarkcited by 103
  12. 2024DebugBench: Evaluating Debugging Capability of Large Language Modelscited by 74
  13. 2024KOR-Bench: Benchmarking Language Models on Knowledge-Orthogonal Reasoning Taskscited by 67
  14. 2024A Systematic Survey on Large Language Models for Algorithm Designcited by 65
  15. 2024Are Your LLMs Capable of Stable Reasoning?cited by 65
  16. 2024UniDebugger: Hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework for Unified Software Debuggingcited by 35
  17. 2024Causal Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 18
  18. 2024HDFlow: Enhancing LLM Complex Problem-Solving with Hybrid Thinking and Dynamic Workflowscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 8; 2026: 3.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Benchmarking Large Language Models for Cryptanalysis and Side-Channel Vulnerabilities
  2. 2025Three Minds, One Legend: Jailbreak Large Reasoning Model with Adaptive Stacked Ciphers
  3. 2025All Code, No Thought: Current Language Models Struggle to Reason in Ciphered Language
  4. 2025CryptoX : Compositional Reasoning Evaluation of Large Language Models
  5. 2026Evaluating Large Language Models for Symbolic Security Protocol Analysis
  6. 2025When Intelligence Fails: An Empirical Study on Why LLMs Struggle with Password Cracking
  7. 2025Rethinking Reasoning: A Survey on Reasoning-based Backdoors in LLMs
  8. 2025Token-Efficient Prompt Injection Attack: Provoking Cessation in LLM Reasoning via Adaptive Token Compression