Should LLM Safety Be More Than Refusing Harmful Instructions?
On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper presents a systematic evaluation of Large Language Models' (LLMs) behavior on long-tail distributed (encrypted) texts and their safety implications. We introduce a two-dimensional framework for assessing LLM safety: (1) instruction refusal-the ability to reject harmful obfuscated instructions, and (2) generation safety-the suppression of generating harmful responses. Through comprehensive experiments, we demonstrate that models that possess capabilities to decrypt ciphers may be susceptible to mismatched-generalization attacks: their safety mechanisms fail on at least one safety dimension, leading to unsafe responses or over-refusal. Based on these findings, we evaluate a number of pre-LLM and post-LLM safeguards and discuss their strengths and limitations. This work contributes to understanding the safety of LLM in long-tail text scenarios and provides directions for developing robust safety mechanisms.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 35 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2025.
Builds on
35 of 58 references.
Closest ancestors · 11
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Endless Jailbreaks with Bijection Learning2 Oct
- 2024Jailbreaking Large Language Models with Symbolic Mathematics17 Sep
- 2024Efficient Adversarial Training in LLMs with Continuous Attacks24 May
- 2024JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Language Models28 Mar
- 2024When "Competency" in Reasoning Opens the Door to Vulnerability: Jailbreaking LLMs via Novel Complex Ciphers16 Feb
- 2024SafeDecoding: Defending against Jailbreak Attacks via Safety-Aware Decoding14 Feb
- 2023DeepInception: Hypnotize Large Language Model to Be Jailbreaker6 Nov
- 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Models3 Oct
- 2023Detecting Language Model Attacks with Perplexity27 Aug
- 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Cipher12 Aug
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?5 Jul
Other references · 24
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
- 2023Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Modelscited by 608
12 more
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Uglycited by 380
- 2024Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Modelscited by 247
- 2023LLM Self Defense: By Self Examination, LLMs Know They Are Being Trickedcited by 226
- 2024ArtPrompt: ASCII Art-based Jailbreak Attacks against Aligned LLMscited by 197
- 2019BPE-Dropout: Simple and Effective Subword Regularizationcited by 189
- 2024Attacks, Defenses and Evaluations for LLM Conversation Safety: A Surveycited by 124
- 2023TELeR: A General Taxonomy of LLM Prompts for Benchmarking Complex Taskscited by 48
- 2022SALSA: Attacking Lattice Cryptography with Transformerscited by 28
- 2024Towards Effective Evaluations and Comparisons for LLM Unlearning Methodscited by 27
- 2025SaRO: Enhancing LLM Safety through Reasoning-based Alignmentcited by 26
- 2025CipherBank: Exploring the Boundary of LLM Reasoning Capabilities through Cryptography Challengescited by 11
- 2025Benchmarking Large Language Models for Cryptanalysis and Side-Channel Vulnerabilitiescited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
6 papers.
- 2025Too Helpful, Too Harmless, Too Honest or Just Right?cited by 9
- 2025DUAL-Bench: Measuring Over-Refusal and Robustness in Vision-Language Modelscited by 5
- 2026Do Large Language Models Reflect Demographic Pluralism in Safety?cited by 1
- 2026When the Model Said 'No Comment', We Knew Helpfulness Was Dead, Honesty Was Alive, and Safety Was Terrifiedcited by 1
- 2026Over-Refusal and Representation Subspaces: A Mechanistic Analysis of Task-Conditioned Refusal in Aligned LLMscited by 1
- 2025InvThink: Premortem Reasoning for Safer Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Over-Refusal and Representation Subspaces: A Mechanistic Analysis of Task-Conditioned Refusal in Aligned LLMs29 Mar 2026
- 2026When the Model Said 'No Comment', We Knew Helpfulness Was Dead, Honesty Was Alive, and Safety Was Terrified7 Feb 2026
- 2026Do Large Language Models Reflect Demographic Pluralism in Safety?7 Feb 2026
- 2025DUAL-Bench: Measuring Over-Refusal and Robustness in Vision-Language Models12 Oct 2025
- 2025InvThink: Premortem Reasoning for Safer Language Models2 Oct 2025
- 2025Too Helpful, Too Harmless, Too Honest or Just Right?10 Sep 2025