mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

HDFlow: Enhancing LLM Complex Problem-Solving with Hybrid Thinking and Dynamic Workflows

arXiv 2409.17433 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 13

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite recent advancements in large language models (LLMs), their performance on complex reasoning problems requiring multi-step thinking and combining various skills is still limited. To address this, we propose a novel framework HDFlow for complex reasoning with LLMs that combines fast and slow thinking modes in an adaptive manner. Our approach consists of two key components: 1) a new approach for slow, deliberate reasoning called Dynamic Workflow, which automatically decomposes complex problems into more manageable sub-tasks and dynamically designs a workflow to assemble specialized LLM or symbolic reasoning tools to solve sub-tasks; 2) Hybrid Thinking, a general framework that dynamically combines fast and slow thinking based on problem complexity. Finally, we propose an easy-to-scale method for automatically synthesizing a large-scale dataset of 27K challenging reasoning problems for complex reasoning and a hybrid thinking tuning method that trains smaller LLMs on this dataset to internalize the fast/slow hybrid reasoning strategies. Experiments on four reasoning benchmark datasets demonstrate that our slow thinking with dynamic workflows significantly outperforms Chain-of-Thought, and hybrid thinking achieves the highest accuracy while providing an effective balance between computational efficiency and performance. Fine-tuning using our hybrid thinking approach also significantly boosts the complex reasoning capabilities of open-source language models. The results showcase the promise of slow thinking, dynamic workflows, and hybrid thinking in expanding the frontier of complex problem-solving with LLMsfootnoteCode and data will be released at urlhttps://github.com/wenlinyao/HDFlow..

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 9 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2024.

Builds on

9 of 29 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models6 Oct

Other references · 8

  1. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  2. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
  3. 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,057
  4. 2019Analysing Mathematical Reasoning Abilities of Neural Modelscited by 331
  5. 2024Self-Discover: Large Language Models Self-Compose Reasoning Structurescited by 108
  6. 2024Code Generation with AlphaCodium: From Prompt Engineering to Flow Engineeringcited by 100
  7. 2024StateFlow: Enhancing LLM Task-Solving through State-Driven Workflowscited by 65
  8. 2024Demystifying Chains, Trees, and Graphs of Thoughtscited by 63

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 11; 2026: 2.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Knowledge Augmented Complex Problem Solving with Large Language Models: A Survey
  2. 2025Fast, Slow, and Tool-augmented Thinking for LLMs: A Review
  3. 2025Reasoning Effort and Problem Complexity: A Scaling Analysis in LLMs
  4. 2024Forest-of-Thought: Scaling Test-Time Compute for Enhancing LLM Reasoning
  5. 2024Multi-Step Reasoning with Large Language Models, a Survey
  6. 2024Divide-or-Conquer? Which Part Should You Distill Your LLM?
  7. 2025An Empirical Study of Reasoning Steps in Thinking Code LLMs
  8. 2026The Periodic Table of LLM Reasoning: A Structured Survey of Reasoning Paradigms, Methods, and Failure Modes