CryptoX : Compositional Reasoning Evaluation of Large Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
The compositional reasoning capacity has long been regarded as critical to the generalization and intelligence emergence of large language models LLMs. However, despite numerous reasoning-related benchmarks, the compositional reasoning capacity of LLMs is rarely studied or quantified in the existing benchmarks. In this paper, we introduce CryptoX, an evaluation framework that, for the first time, combines existing benchmarks and cryptographic, to quantify the compositional reasoning capacity of LLMs. Building upon CryptoX, we construct CryptoBench, which integrates these principles into several benchmarks for systematic evaluation. We conduct detailed experiments on widely used open-source and closed-source LLMs using CryptoBench, revealing a huge gap between open-source and closed-source LLMs. We further conduct thorough mechanical interpretability experiments to reveal the inner mechanism of LLMs' compositional reasoning, involving subproblem decomposition, subproblem inference, and summarizing subproblem conclusions. Through analysis based on CryptoBench, we highlight the value of independently studying compositional reasoning and emphasize the need to enhance the compositional reasoning capabilities of LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 28 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2025.
Builds on
28 of 50 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Grokked Transformers are Implicit Reasoners: A Mechanistic Journey to the Edge of Generalization23 May
- 2024Understanding and Patching Compositional Reasoning in LLMs22 Feb
- 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Models7 Oct
- 2022FOLIO: Natural Language Reasoning with First-Order Logic2 Sep
Other references · 24
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
- 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,449
- 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,397
- 2020Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Stepscited by 1,259
- 2024Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Modelscited by 225
12 more
- 2021CREAK: A Dataset for Commonsense Reasoning over Entity Knowledgecited by 88
- 2024MAP-Neo: Highly Capable and Transparent Bilingual Large Language Model Seriescited by 67
- 2024KOR-Bench: Benchmarking Language Models on Knowledge-Orthogonal Reasoning Taskscited by 67
- 2024Jamba-1.5: Hybrid Transformer-Mamba Models at Scalecited by 48
- 2021COM2SENSE: A Commonsense Reasoning Benchmark with Complementary Sentencescited by 40
- 2024Evaluating and Aligning CodeLLMs on Human Preferencecited by 22
- 2023Memory Injections: Correcting Multi-Hop Reasoning Failures during Inference in Transformer-Based Language Modelscited by 21
- 2024LogicGame: Benchmarking Rule-Based Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2024ExecRepoBench: Multi-level Executable Code Completion Evaluationcited by 19
- 2024MdEval: Massively Multilingual Code Debuggingcited by 16
- 2024Understanding the Interplay between Parametric and Contextual Knowledge for Large Language Modelscited by 14
- 2024Getting More from Less: Large Language Models are Good Spontaneous Multilingual Learnerscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025From Code Foundation Models to Agents and Applications: A Comprehensive Survey and Practical Guide to Code Intelligencecited by 13
- 2025Agentic Deep Graph Reasoning Yields Self-Organizing Knowledge Networkscited by 12
- 2025KORGym: A Dynamic Game Platform for LLM Reasoning Evaluationcited by 7
- 2026Chain of Event-Centric Causal Thought for Physically Plausible Video Generationcited by 6
- 2026JT-SAFE-V2: Safety-by-Design Foundation Model with World-Context Datacited by 0
- 2026JT-SAFE-V2: Safety-by-Design Foundation Model with World-Context Data23 May 2026
- 2026Chain of Event-Centric Causal Thought for Physically Plausible Video Generation10 Mar 2026
- 2025From Code Foundation Models to Agents and Applications: A Comprehensive Survey and Practical Guide to Code Intelligence23 Nov 2025
- 2025KORGym: A Dynamic Game Platform for LLM Reasoning Evaluation20 May 2025
- 2025Agentic Deep Graph Reasoning Yields Self-Organizing Knowledge Networks18 Feb 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Do Large Language Models Have Compositional Ability? An Investigation into Limitations and Scalability
- 2023Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality
- 2025AgentCoMa: A Compositional Benchmark Mixing Commonsense and Mathematical Reasoning in Real-World Scenarios
- 2024Assessing the Emergent Symbolic Reasoning Abilities of Llama Large Language Models
- 2026BaziQA-Benchmark: Evaluating Symbolic and Temporally Compositional Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2025Dissecting Logical Reasoning in LLMs: A Fine-Grained Evaluation and Supervision Study
- 2026A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Reasoning: From Single-Model to Multi-Agent Paradigms
- 2023Chain-of-Thought Hub: A Continuous Effort to Measure Large Language Models' Reasoning Performance