mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

RepliBench: Evaluating the Autonomous Replication Capabilities of Language Model Agents

arXiv 2504.18565 ↗First posted 21 Apr 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 12

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Uncontrollable autonomous replication of language model agents poses a critical safety risk. To better understand this risk, we introduce RepliBench, a suite of evaluations designed to measure autonomous replication capabilities. RepliBench is derived from a decomposition of these capabilities covering four core domains: obtaining resources, exfiltrating model weights, replicating onto compute, and persisting on this compute for long periods. We create 20 novel task families consisting of 86 individual tasks. We benchmark 5 frontier models, and find they do not currently pose a credible threat of self-replication, but succeed on many components and are improving rapidly. Models can deploy instances from cloud compute providers, write self-propagating programs, and exfiltrate model weights under simple security setups, but struggle to pass KYC checks or set up robust and persistent agent deployments. Overall the best model we evaluated (Claude 3.7 Sonnet) has a >50% pass@10 score on 15/20 task families, and a >50% pass@10 score for 9/20 families on the hardest variants. These findings suggest autonomous replication capability could soon emerge with improvements in these remaining areas or with human assistance.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2025.

Builds on

12 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Magentic-One: A Generalist Multi-Agent System for Solving Complex Tasks7 Nov
  2. 2023Evaluating Language-Model Agents on Realistic Autonomous Tasks18 Dec

Other references · 10

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  3. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
  4. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,628
  5. 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 651
  6. 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 527
  7. 2024LLM Agents Grounded in Self-Reports Enable General-Purpose Simulation of Individualscited by 235
  8. 2024RE-Bench: Evaluating frontier AI R&D capabilities of language model agents against human expertscited by 153
  9. 2024Evaluating Large Language Models' Capability to Launch Fully Automated Spear Phishing Campaigns: Validated on Human Subjectscited by 17
  10. 2024Frontier AI systems have surpassed the self-replicating red linecited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 6.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Large language model-powered AI systems achieve self-replication with no human intervention
  2. 2026GuardianAgentBench: Where Agents Fail and How to Guard Them
  3. 2026PACE: Two-Timescale Self-Evolution for Small Language Model Agents
  4. 2026AgentHijack: Benchmarking Computer Use Agent Robustness to Common Environment Corruptions
  5. 2026Self-Healing Agentic Orchestrators for Reliable Tool-Augmented Large Language Model Systems
  6. 2026UniACE: A Unified Framework for Evaluating LLM Agentic Capabilities
  7. 2025NL2Repo-Bench: Towards Long-Horizon Repository Generation Evaluation of Coding Agents
  8. 2026MOSS: Self-Evolution through Source-Level Rewriting in Autonomous Agent Systems