RepliBench: Evaluating the Autonomous Replication Capabilities of Language Model Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Uncontrollable autonomous replication of language model agents poses a critical safety risk. To better understand this risk, we introduce RepliBench, a suite of evaluations designed to measure autonomous replication capabilities. RepliBench is derived from a decomposition of these capabilities covering four core domains: obtaining resources, exfiltrating model weights, replicating onto compute, and persisting on this compute for long periods. We create 20 novel task families consisting of 86 individual tasks. We benchmark 5 frontier models, and find they do not currently pose a credible threat of self-replication, but succeed on many components and are improving rapidly. Models can deploy instances from cloud compute providers, write self-propagating programs, and exfiltrate model weights under simple security setups, but struggle to pass KYC checks or set up robust and persistent agent deployments. Overall the best model we evaluated (Claude 3.7 Sonnet) has a >50% pass@10 score on 15/20 task families, and a >50% pass@10 score for 9/20 families on the hardest variants. These findings suggest autonomous replication capability could soon emerge with improvements in these remaining areas or with human assistance.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2025.
Builds on
12 of 30 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Magentic-One: A Generalist Multi-Agent System for Solving Complex Tasks7 Nov
- 2023Evaluating Language-Model Agents on Realistic Autonomous Tasks18 Dec
Other references · 10
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
- 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,628
- 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 651
- 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 527
- 2024LLM Agents Grounded in Self-Reports Enable General-Purpose Simulation of Individualscited by 235
- 2024RE-Bench: Evaluating frontier AI R&D capabilities of language model agents against human expertscited by 153
- 2024Evaluating Large Language Models' Capability to Launch Fully Automated Spear Phishing Campaigns: Validated on Human Subjectscited by 17
- 2024Frontier AI systems have surpassed the self-replicating red linecited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 6.
12 papers.
- 2025Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safetycited by 222
- 2025Adversarial Attacks on Robotic Vision Language Action Modelscited by 31
- 2025Async Control: Stress-testing Asynchronous Control Measures for LLM Agentscited by 18
- 2025Incomplete Tasks Induce Shutdown Resistance in Some Frontier LLMscited by 16
- 2025Dive into the Agent Matrix: A Realistic Evaluation of Self-Replication Risk in LLM Agentscited by 5
- 2025Manipulation Attacks by Misaligned AI: Risk Analysis and Safety Case Frameworkcited by 4
- 2026ForesightSafety Bench: A Frontier Risk Evaluation and Governance Framework towards Safe AIcited by 3
- 2026Instrumental Choices: Measuring the Propensity of LLM Agents to Pursue Instrumental Behaviorscited by 2
- 2026From Helpfulness to Toxic Proactivity: Diagnosing Behavioral Misalignment in LLM Agentscited by 1
- 2026APRES: An Agentic Paper Revision and Evaluation Systemcited by 1
- 2026Taxonomy and Consistency Analysis of Safety Benchmarks for AI Agentscited by 1
- 2026Ecology of AI Agents: Collaboration Creates a Population Threshold for Takeoffcited by 0
- 2026Ecology of AI Agents: Collaboration Creates a Population Threshold for Takeoff8 Oct 2026
- 2026Instrumental Choices: Measuring the Propensity of LLM Agents to Pursue Instrumental Behaviors7 May 2026
- 2026Taxonomy and Consistency Analysis of Safety Benchmarks for AI Agents11 Apr 2026
- 2026APRES: An Agentic Paper Revision and Evaluation System3 Mar 2026
- 2026ForesightSafety Bench: A Frontier Risk Evaluation and Governance Framework towards Safe AI15 Feb 2026
- 2026From Helpfulness to Toxic Proactivity: Diagnosing Behavioral Misalignment in LLM Agents4 Feb 2026
- 2025Async Control: Stress-testing Asynchronous Control Measures for LLM Agents15 Dec 2025
- 2025Dive into the Agent Matrix: A Realistic Evaluation of Self-Replication Risk in LLM Agents29 Sep 2025
- 2025Incomplete Tasks Induce Shutdown Resistance in Some Frontier LLMs13 Sep 2025
- 2025Manipulation Attacks by Misaligned AI: Risk Analysis and Safety Case Framework17 Jul 2025
- 2025Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safety15 Jul 2025
- 2025Adversarial Attacks on Robotic Vision Language Action Models3 Jun 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Large language model-powered AI systems achieve self-replication with no human intervention
- 2026GuardianAgentBench: Where Agents Fail and How to Guard Them
- 2026PACE: Two-Timescale Self-Evolution for Small Language Model Agents
- 2026AgentHijack: Benchmarking Computer Use Agent Robustness to Common Environment Corruptions
- 2026Self-Healing Agentic Orchestrators for Reliable Tool-Augmented Large Language Model Systems
- 2026UniACE: A Unified Framework for Evaluating LLM Agentic Capabilities
- 2025NL2Repo-Bench: Towards Long-Horizon Repository Generation Evaluation of Coding Agents
- 2026MOSS: Self-Evolution through Source-Level Rewriting in Autonomous Agent Systems