mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Plasma State Monitoring and Disruption Characterization using Multimodal VAEs

arXiv 2504.17710 ↗First posted 24 Apr 2025physics.plasm-ph cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When a plasma disrupts in a tokamak, significant heat and electromagnetic loads are deposited onto the surrounding device components. These forces scale with plasma current and magnetic field strength, making disruptions one of the key challenges for future devices. Unfortunately, disruptions are not fully understood, with many different underlying causes that are difficult to anticipate. Data-driven models have shown success in predicting them, but they only provide limited interpretability. On the other hand, large-scale statistical analyses have been a great asset to understanding disruptive patterns. In this paper, we leverage data-driven methods to find an interpretable representation of the plasma state for disruption characterization. Specifically, we use a latent variable model to represent diagnostic measurements as a low-dimensional, latent representation. We build upon the Variational Autoencoder (VAE) framework, and extend it for (1) continuous projections of plasma trajectories; (2) a multimodal structure to separate operating regimes; and (3) separation with respect to disruptive regimes. Subsequently, we can identify continuous indicators for the disruption rate and the disruptivity based on statistical properties of measurement data. The proposed method is demonstrated using a dataset of approximately 1600 TCV discharges, selecting for flat-top disruptions or regular terminations. We evaluate the method with respect to (1) the identified disruption risk and its correlation with other plasma properties; (2) the ability to distinguish different types of disruptions; and (3) downstream analyses. For the latter, we conduct a demonstrative study on identifying parameters connected to disruptions using counterfactual-like analysis. Overall, the method can adequately identify distinct operating regimes characterized by varying proximity to disruptions in an interpretable manner.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2025.

Builds on

22 of 96 references.

References · 22

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  3. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  4. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  5. 2020NVAE: A Deep Hierarchical Variational Autoencodercited by 637
  6. 2016Deep Unsupervised Clustering with Gaussian Mixture Variational Autoencoderscited by 220
  7. 2018Hyperspherical Variational Auto-Encoderscited by 189
  8. 2018Training behavior of deep neural network in frequency domaincited by 174
  9. 2024The Road Less Scheduledcited by 163
  10. 2020Dynamical Variational Autoencoders: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 128
  11. 2020Multivariate Confidence Calibration for Object Detectioncited by 98
  12. 2019A Recurrent Variational Autoencoder for Speech Enhancementcited by 38
10 more
  1. 2023Plasma Surrogate Modelling using Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 29
  2. 2018Disentangling Latent Space for VAE by Label Relevant/Irrelevant Dimensionscited by 19
  3. 2020Hybrid deep learning architecture for general disruption prediction across tokamakscited by 17
  4. 2023Fast Dynamic 1D Simulation of Divertor Plasmas with Neural PDE Surrogatescited by 9
  5. 2025Calibrated Physics-Informed Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 8
  6. 2023Beyond Vanilla Variational Autoencoders: Detecting Posterior Collapse in Conditional and Hierarchical Variational Autoencoderscited by 7
  7. 2024Towards aerodynamic surrogate modeling based on β-variational autoencoderscited by 5
  8. 2020Integrated real-time supervisory management for off-normal-event handling and feedback control of tokamak plasmascited by 2
  9. 2025Robust Confinement State Classification with Uncertainty Quantification through Ensembled Data-Driven Methodscited by 2
  10. 2025Towards Transparent and Accurate Plasma State Monitoring at JETcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.