mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hybrid deep learning architecture for general disruption prediction across tokamaks

arXiv 2007.01401 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2020physics.plasm-ph cs.LGcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we present a new deep learning disruption prediction algorithm based on important findings from explorative data analysis which effectively allows knowledge transfer from existing devices to new ones, thereby predicting disruptions using very limited disruptive data from the new devices. The explorative data analysis conducted via unsupervised clustering techniques confirms that time-sequence data are much better separators of disruptive and non-disruptive behavior than the instantaneous plasma state data with further advantageous implications for a sequence-based predictor. Based on such important findings, we have designed a new algorithm for multi-machine disruption prediction that achieves high predictive accuracy on the C-Mod (AUC=0.801), DIII-D (AUC=0.947) and EAST (AUC=0.973) tokamaks with limited hyperparameter tuning. Through numerical experiments, we show that boosted accuracy (AUC=0.959) is achieved on EAST predictions by including in the training only 20 disruptive discharges, thousands of non-disruptive discharges from EAST, and combining this with more than a thousand discharges from DIII-D and C-Mod. The improvement of predictive ability obtained by combining disruptive data from other devices is found to be true for all permutations of the three devices. Furthermore, by comparing the predictive performance of each individual numerical experiment, we find that non-disruptive data are machine-specific while disruptive data from multiple devices contain device-independent knowledge that can be used to inform predictions for disruptions occurring on a new device.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

17 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Fast Dynamic 1D Simulation of Divertor Plasmas with Neural PDE Surrogatescited by 9
  2. 2021Scenario adaptive disruption prediction study for next generation burning-plasma tokamakscited by 5
  3. 2022IDP-PGFE: An Interpretable Disruption Predictor based on Physics-Guided Feature Extractioncited by 3
  4. 2025Learning Plasma Dynamics and Robust Rampdown Trajectories with Predict-First Experiments at TCVcited by 3
  5. 2026TokaMark: A Comprehensive Benchmark for MAST Tokamak Plasma Modelscited by 3
  6. 2023Continuous Convolutional Neural Networks for Disruption Prediction in Nuclear Fusion Plasmascited by 2
  7. 2025Robust Confinement State Classification with Uncertainty Quantification through Ensembled Data-Driven Methodscited by 2
  8. 2025Plasma State Monitoring and Disruption Characterization using Multimodal VAEscited by 2
  9. 2025FusionMAE: large-scale pretrained model to optimize and simplify diagnostic and control of fusion plasmacited by 2
  10. 2023Cross-tokamak Disruption Prediction based on Physics-Guided Feature Extraction and domain adaptationcited by 1
  11. 2024EuroPED-NN: Uncertainty aware surrogate modelcited by 1
  12. 2024Time Series Viewmakers for Robust Disruption Predictioncited by 1
5 more
  1. 2023Disruption Precursor Onset Time Study Based on Semi-supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 0
  2. 2026Hierarchical Multi-to-Single-Modal Knowledge Distillation for Disruption Prediction in EASTcited by 0
  3. 2026Interpretable statistical feature engineering for early disruption prediction in the short pulse ADITYA tokamakcited by 0
  4. 2026Horizon-Aware Early Event Prediction for Tokamak Disruption Alarmscited by 0
  5. 2026FusionMMT: A Unified Multimodal and Multitask Learning Framework for Nuclear Fusioncited by 0