Towards aerodynamic surrogate modeling based on β-variational autoencoders
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Surrogate models that combine dimensionality reduction and regression techniques are essential to reduce the need for costly high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics data. New approaches using β-Variational Autoencoder (β-VAE) architectures have shown promise in obtaining high-quality low-dimensional representations of high-dimensional flow data while enabling physical interpretation of their latent spaces. We propose a surrogate model based on latent space regression to predict pressure distributions on a transonic wing given the flight conditions: Mach number and angle of attack. The β-VAE model, enhanced with Principal Component Analysis (PCA), maps high-dimensional data to a low-dimensional latent space, showing a direct correlation with flight conditions. Regularization through β requires careful tuning to improve overall performance, while PCA preprocessing helps to construct an effective latent space, improving autoencoder training and performance. Gaussian Process Regression is used to predict latent space variables from flight conditions, showing robust behavior independent of β, and the decoder reconstructs the high-dimensional pressure field data. This pipeline provides insight into unexplored flight conditions. Furthermore, a fine-tuning process of the decoder further refines the model, reducing the dependence on β and enhancing accuracy. Structured latent space, robust regression performance, and significant improvements in fine-tuning collectively create a highly accurate and efficient surrogate model. Our methodology demonstrates the effectiveness of β-VAEs for aerodynamic surrogate modeling, offering a rapid, cost-effective, and reliable alternative for aerodynamic data prediction.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2024.
Builds on
9 of 62 references.
References · 9
- 2018Understanding disentangling in β-VAEcited by 335
- 2023β-Variational autoencoders and transformers for reduced-order modelling of fluid flowscited by 77
- 2023Manifold learning: what, how, and whycited by 68
- 2021Towards extraction of orthogonal and parsimonious non-linear modes from turbulent flowscited by 45
- 2022Machine Learning in Aerodynamic Shape Optimizationcited by 39
- 2020Deep Neural Networks for Nonlinear Model Order Reduction of Unsteady Flowscited by 36
- 2022Physics-aware Reduced-order Modeling of Transonic Flow via β-Variational Autoencodercited by 15
- 2023Physics-Assisted Reduced-Order Modeling for Identifying Dominant Features of Transonic Buffetcited by 2
- 2024Predicting Transonic Flowfields in Non-Homogeneous Unstructured Grids Using Autoencoder Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2026AeroJEPA: Learning Semantic Latent Representations for Scalable 3D Aerodynamic Field Modelingcited by 4
- 2025Surrogate Modeling of 3D Rayleigh-Benard Convection with Equivariant Autoencoderscited by 3
- 2025Plasma State Monitoring and Disruption Characterization using Multimodal VAEscited by 2
- 2025Multi-fidelity aerodynamic data fusion by autoencoder transfer learningcited by 0
- 2026Signal-Aware Conditional Diffusion Surrogates for Transonic Wing Pressure Predictioncited by 0
- 2026AeroJEPA: Learning Semantic Latent Representations for Scalable 3D Aerodynamic Field Modeling7 May 2026
- 2026Signal-Aware Conditional Diffusion Surrogates for Transonic Wing Pressure Prediction13 Apr 2026
- 2025Multi-fidelity aerodynamic data fusion by autoencoder transfer learning15 Dec 2025
- 2025Surrogate Modeling of 3D Rayleigh-Benard Convection with Equivariant Autoencoders19 May 2025
- 2025Plasma State Monitoring and Disruption Characterization using Multimodal VAEs24 Apr 2025