mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Peering Behind the Shield: Guardrail Identification in Large Language Models

arXiv 2502.01241 ↗First posted 3 Feb 2025cs.CRcited by 5

On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails

Abstract (arXiv)

With the rapid adoption of large language models (LLMs), conversational AI agents have become widely deployed across real-world applications. To enhance safety, these agents are often equipped with guardrails that moderate harmful content. Identifying the guardrails in an agent thus becomes critical for adversaries to understand the system and design guard-specific attacks. In this work, we introduce AP-Test, a novel approach that leverages guard-specific adversarial prompts to detect the identity of guardrails deployed in black-box AI agents. Our method addresses key challenges in this task, including the influence of safety-aligned LLMs and other guardrails, as well as a lack of principled decision-making strategies. AP-Test employs two complementary testing strategies, input and output guard tests, and a new metric, match score, to enable robust identification. Experiments across diverse agents and four open-source guardrails demonstrate that AP-Test achieves perfect classification accuracy in multiple scenarios. Ablation studies further highlight the necessity of our proposed components. Our findings reveal a practical path toward guardrail identification in real-world AI systems.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.