mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Reinforcement Learning Framework for Robust and Secure LLM Watermarking

arXiv 2510.21053 ↗First posted 23 Oct 2025cs.CRcited by 4

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

Watermarking has emerged as a promising solution for tracing and authenticating text generated by large language models (LLMs). A common approach to LLM watermarking is to construct a green/red token list and assign higher or lower generation probabilities to the corresponding tokens, respectively. However, most existing watermarking algorithms rely on heuristic green/red token list designs, as directly optimizing the list design with techniques such as reinforcement learning (RL) comes with several challenges. First, desirable watermarking involves multiple criteria, i.e., detectability, text quality, robustness against removal attacks, and security against spoofing attacks. Directly optimizing for these criteria introduces many partially conflicting reward terms, leading to an unstable convergence process. Second, the vast action space of green/red token list choices is susceptible to reward hacking. In this paper, we propose an end-to-end RL framework for robust and secure LLM watermarking. Our approach adopts an anchoring mechanism for reward terms to ensure stable training and introduces additional regularization terms to prevent reward hacking. Experiments on standard benchmarks with two backbone LLMs show that our method achieves a state-of-the-art trade-off across all criteria, with notable improvements in resistance to spoofing attacks without degrading other criteria. Our code is available at https://github.com/UCSB-NLP-Chang/RL-watermark.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Learning to Watermark LLM-generated Text via Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2025Improving Detection of Watermarked Language Models
  3. 2026Language Model Fingerprinting Requires Rethinking Watermark Teachers
  4. 2026WaterMoE: Expert-Routing-based Watermarking for High Fidelity and Efficiency
  5. 2026Improving the Trade-off Between Watermark Strength and Speculative Sampling Efficiency for Language Models
  6. 2024Inevitable Trade-off between Watermark Strength and Speculative Sampling Efficiency for Language Models
  7. 2025Watermarking Diffusion Language Models
  8. 2025Position: LLM Watermarking Should Align Stakeholders' Incentives for Practical Adoption