Provably Robust Watermarks for Open-Source Language Models
On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models
Abstract (arXiv)
The recent explosion of high-quality language models has necessitated new methods for identifying AI-generated text. Watermarking is a leading solution and could prove to be an essential tool in the age of generative AI. Existing approaches embed watermarks at inference and crucially rely on the large language model (LLM) specification and parameters being secret, which makes them inapplicable to the open-source setting. In this work, we introduce the first watermarking scheme for open-source LLMs. Our scheme works by modifying the parameters of the model, but the watermark can be detected from just the outputs of the model. Perhaps surprisingly, we prove that our watermarks are unremovable under certain assumptions about the adversary's knowledge. To demonstrate the behavior of our construction under concrete parameter instantiations, we present experimental results with OPT-6.7B and OPT-1.3B. We demonstrate robustness to both token substitution and perturbation of the model parameters. We find that the stronger of these attacks, the model-perturbation attack, requires deteriorating the quality score to 0 out of 100 in order to bring the detection rate down to 50%.
Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 12 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2024.
Builds on
12 of 18 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Watermarking Makes Language Models Radioactive22 Feb
- 2024Pseudorandom Error-Correcting Codes14 Feb
- 2023On the Learnability of Watermarks for Language Models7 Dec
- 2023Mark My Words: Analyzing and Evaluating Language Model Watermarks1 Dec
- 2023Publicly-Detectable Watermarking for Language Models27 Oct
- 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models28 Jul
- 2023Undetectable Watermarks for Language Models25 May
- 2023A Watermark for Large Language Models24 Jan
Other references · 4
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
- 2023The Science of Detecting LLM-Generated Textscited by 128
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 8; 2026: 5.
13 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2025Towards Watermarking of Open-Source LLMscited by 13
- 2025Watermarking Diffusion Language Modelscited by 10
- 2025LLM Fingerprinting via Semantically Conditioned Watermarkscited by 9
- 2025Position: LLM Watermarking Should Align Stakeholders' Incentives for Practical Adoptioncited by 7
- 2025The Challenge of Identifying the Origin of Black-Box Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2025PRO: Enabling Precise and Robust Text Watermark for Open-Source LLMscited by 4
- 2026Watermarking Should Be Treated as a Monitoring Primitivecited by 2
- 2025LLM Watermarking Using Mixtures and Statistical-to-Computational Gapscited by 1
- 2026Echoes of ownership: Adversarial-guided dual injection for copyright protection in MLLMscited by 1
- 2025MarkTune: Improving the Quality-Detectability Trade-off in Open-Weight LLM Watermarkingcited by 0
- 2026Can we Watermark Low-Entropy LLM Outputs?cited by 0
- 2026Validity Threats for Foundation Model Researchcited by 0
1 more
- 2026OpenStamp: A Watermark for Open-Source Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026OpenStamp: A Watermark for Open-Source Language Models28 Aug 2026
- 2026Validity Threats for Foundation Model Research3 Jun 2026
- 2026Watermarking Should Be Treated as a Monitoring Primitive13 May 2026
- 2026Can we Watermark Low-Entropy LLM Outputs?13 Apr 2026
- 2026Echoes of ownership: Adversarial-guided dual injection for copyright protection in MLLMs21 Feb 2026
- 2025MarkTune: Improving the Quality-Detectability Trade-off in Open-Weight LLM Watermarking3 Dec 2025
- 2025PRO: Enabling Precise and Robust Text Watermark for Open-Source LLMs27 Oct 2025
- 2025Position: LLM Watermarking Should Align Stakeholders' Incentives for Practical Adoption21 Oct 2025
- 2025Watermarking Diffusion Language Models29 Sep 2025
- 2025LLM Fingerprinting via Semantically Conditioned Watermarks22 May 2025
- 2025LLM Watermarking Using Mixtures and Statistical-to-Computational Gaps2 May 2025
- 2025The Challenge of Identifying the Origin of Black-Box Large Language Models6 Mar 2025
1 more
- 2025Towards Watermarking of Open-Source LLMs14 Feb 2025
- 2025Towards Watermarking of Open-Source LLMscited by 13
- 2025LLM Fingerprinting via Semantically Conditioned Watermarkscited by 9
- 2025Position: LLM Watermarking Should Align Stakeholders' Incentives for Practical Adoptioncited by 7
- 2025PRO: Enabling Precise and Robust Text Watermark for Open-Source LLMscited by 4
- 2025LLM Watermarking Using Mixtures and Statistical-to-Computational Gapscited by 1
- 2025MarkTune: Improving the Quality-Detectability Trade-off in Open-Weight LLM Watermarkingcited by 0
- 2026Can we Watermark Low-Entropy LLM Outputs?cited by 0
- 2026OpenStamp: A Watermark for Open-Source Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026OpenStamp: A Watermark for Open-Source Language Models28 Aug 2026
- 2026Can we Watermark Low-Entropy LLM Outputs?13 Apr 2026
- 2025MarkTune: Improving the Quality-Detectability Trade-off in Open-Weight LLM Watermarking3 Dec 2025
- 2025PRO: Enabling Precise and Robust Text Watermark for Open-Source LLMs27 Oct 2025
- 2025Position: LLM Watermarking Should Align Stakeholders' Incentives for Practical Adoption21 Oct 2025
- 2025LLM Fingerprinting via Semantically Conditioned Watermarks22 May 2025
- 2025LLM Watermarking Using Mixtures and Statistical-to-Computational Gaps2 May 2025
- 2025Towards Watermarking of Open-Source LLMs14 Feb 2025
- 2025Watermarking Diffusion Language Modelscited by 10
- 2025Watermarking Diffusion Language Models29 Sep 2025
- 2025The Challenge of Identifying the Origin of Black-Box Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2026Watermarking Should Be Treated as a Monitoring Primitivecited by 2
- 2026Echoes of ownership: Adversarial-guided dual injection for copyright protection in MLLMscited by 1
- 2026Validity Threats for Foundation Model Researchcited by 0
- 2026Validity Threats for Foundation Model Research3 Jun 2026
- 2026Watermarking Should Be Treated as a Monitoring Primitive13 May 2026
- 2026Echoes of ownership: Adversarial-guided dual injection for copyright protection in MLLMs21 Feb 2026
- 2025The Challenge of Identifying the Origin of Black-Box Large Language Models6 Mar 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Baselines for Identifying Watermarked Large Language Models
- 2024Learnable Linguistic Watermarks for Tracing Model Extraction Attacks on Large Language Models
- 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text
- 2024PostMark: A Robust Blackbox Watermark for Large Language Models
- 2024Watermarking Language Models for Many Adaptive Users
- 2023A Semantic Invariant Robust Watermark for Large Language Models
- 2024Watermarking Large Language Models and the Generated Content: Opportunities and Challenges
- 2023Necessary and Sufficient Watermark for Large Language Models