mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DoomArena: A framework for Testing AI Agents Against Evolving Security Threats

arXiv 2504.14064 ↗First posted 18 Apr 2025cs.CRcited by 31

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

We present DoomArena, a security evaluation framework for AI agents. DoomArena is designed on three principles: 1) It is a plug-in framework and integrates easily into realistic agentic frameworks like BrowserGym (for web agents) and τ-bench (for tool calling agents); 2) It is configurable and allows for detailed threat modeling, allowing configuration of specific components of the agentic framework being attackable, and specifying targets for the attacker; and 3) It is modular and decouples the development of attacks from details of the environment in which the agent is deployed, allowing for the same attacks to be applied across multiple environments. We illustrate several advantages of our framework, including the ability to adapt to new threat models and environments easily, the ability to easily combine several previously published attacks to enable comprehensive and fine-grained security testing, and the ability to analyze trade-offs between various vulnerabilities and performance. We apply DoomArena to state-of-the-art (SOTA) web and tool-calling agents and find a number of surprising results: 1) SOTA agents have varying levels of vulnerability to different threat models (malicious user vs malicious environment), and there is no Pareto dominant agent across all threat models; 2) When multiple attacks are applied to an agent, they often combine constructively; 3) Guardrail model-based defenses seem to fail, while defenses based on powerful SOTA LLMs work better. DoomArena is available at https://github.com/ServiceNow/DoomArena.

Key facts. Cited by 31 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 32 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2025.

Builds on

32 of 50 references.

Closest ancestors · 13

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025AgentDAM: Privacy Leakage Evaluation for Autonomous Web Agents12 Mar
  2. 2025SafeArena: Evaluating the Safety of Autonomous Web Agents6 Mar
  3. 2025Why Are Web AI Agents More Vulnerable Than Standalone LLMs? A Security Analysis27 Feb
  4. 2025Firewalls to Secure Dynamic LLM Agentic Networks3 Feb
  5. 2024Attacking Vision-Language Computer Agents via Pop-ups4 Nov
  6. 2024Refusal-Trained LLMs Are Easily Jailbroken As Browser Agents11 Oct
  7. 2024AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents11 Oct
  8. 2024ST-WebAgentBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Safety and Trustworthiness in Web Agents9 Oct
  9. 2024EIA: Environmental Injection Attack on Generalist Web Agents for Privacy Leakage17 Sep
  10. 2024AgentPoison: Red-teaming LLM Agents via Poisoning Memory or Knowledge Bases17 Jul
  11. 2024AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents19 Jun
  12. 2024Dissecting Adversarial Robustness of Multimodal LM Agents18 Jun
1 more
  1. 2024AirGapAgent: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agents8 May

Other references · 19

  1. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
  2. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
  3. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  4. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  5. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
  6. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
  7. 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,134
  8. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
  9. 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 760
  10. 2023"Do Anything Now": Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language Modelscited by 457
  11. 2023FigStep: Jailbreaking Large Vision-Language Models via Typographic Visual Promptscited by 368
  12. 2024WorkArena: How Capable Are Web Agents at Solving Common Knowledge Work Tasks?cited by 348
7 more
  1. 2024TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Taskscited by 306
  2. 2018Reinforcement Learning on Web Interfaces Using Workflow-Guided Explorationcited by 282
  3. 2023Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks Through Goal Prioritizationcited by 156
  4. 2024The BrowserGym Ecosystem for Web Agent Researchcited by 152
  5. 2024AIR-Bench 2024: A Safety Benchmark Based on Risk Categories from Regulations and Policiescited by 69
  6. 2023Jailbreaking GPT-4V via Self-Adversarial Attacks with System Promptscited by 62
  7. 2024PyRIT: A Framework for Security Risk Identification and Red Teaming in Generative AI Systemcited by 29

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 16; 2026: 15.

31 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025A Survey of LLM-Driven AI Agent Communication: Protocols, Security Risks, and Defense Countermeasurescited by 54
  2. 2025RedTeamCUA: Realistic Adversarial Testing of Computer-Use Agents in Hybrid Web-OS Environmentscited by 42
  3. 2025Agentic AI Security: Threats, Defenses, Evaluation, and Open Challengescited by 26
  4. 2025WebGuard: Building a Generalizable Guardrail for Web Agentscited by 20
  5. 2025Build the web for agents, not agents for the webcited by 17
  6. 2025A Survey on Agentic Security: Applications, Threats and Defensescited by 17
  7. 2025FocusAgent: Simple Yet Effective Ways of Trimming the Large Context of Web Agentscited by 16
  8. 2025VoiceAgentBench: Are Voice Assistants ready for agentic tasks?cited by 15
  9. 2025WAREX: Web Agent Reliability Evaluation on Existing Benchmarkscited by 14
  10. 2026CausalArmor: Efficient Indirect Prompt Injection Guardrails via Causal Attributioncited by 13
  11. 2026The Blind Spot of Agent Safety: How Benign User Instructions Expose Critical Vulnerabilities in Computer-Use Agentscited by 12
  12. 2025Systems Security Foundations for Agentic Computingcited by 9
19 more
  1. 2025Just Do It!? Computer-Use Agents Exhibit Blind Goal-Directednesscited by 8
  2. 2025SusBench: An Online Benchmark for Evaluating Dark Pattern Susceptibility of Computer-Use Agentscited by 8
  3. 2026When Actions Go Off-Task: Detecting and Correcting Misaligned Actions in Computer-Use Agentscited by 8
  4. 2025Graph2Eval: Automatic Multimodal Task Generation for Agents via Knowledge Graphscited by 7
  5. 2025Malice in Agentland: Down the Rabbit Hole of Backdoors in the AI Supply Chaincited by 6
  6. 2025Mind the Web: The Security of Web Use Agentscited by 5
  7. 2026Toward Secure LLM Agents: Threat Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluationcited by 5
  8. 2025ATAG: AI-Agent Application Threat Assessment with Attack Graphscited by 4
  9. 2026From Biased Chatbots to Biased Agents: Examining Role Assignment Effects on LLM Agent Robustnesscited by 3
  10. 2026ClawTrap: A MITM-Based Red-Teaming Framework for Real-World OpenClaw Security Evaluationcited by 3
  11. 2026WAAA! Web Adversaries Against Agentic Browserscited by 3
  12. 2026Benchmarking Web Agent Safety under E-commerce Deceptive Interfacescited by 3
  13. 2026Untrusted Content Masking for Web Agents with Security Guaranteescited by 3
  14. 2026StepJack: Benchmarking Computer-Use Agent Safety Against Multi-Step Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 2
  15. 2026PolicyBank: Evolving Policy Understanding for LLM Agentscited by 1
  16. 2026Invisible Ink Threats: Adversarial Goals Behind Legitimate Tasks in Computer-Use Agentscited by 1
  17. 2026DRIP-R: A Benchmark for Decision-Making and Reasoning Under Real-World Policy Ambiguity in the Retail Domaincited by 0
  18. 2026Signal-Driven Observation for Long-Horizon Web Agentscited by 0
  19. 2026FraudBench: Stress-Testing Policy-Grounded Banking Agents Against Adaptive Fraudcited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025OpenAgentSafety: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Real-World AI Agent Safety
  2. 2026NAAMSE: Framework for Evolutionary Security Evaluation of Agents
  3. 2026A Systematic Survey of Security Threats and Defenses in LLM-Based AI Agents: A Layered Attack Surface Framework
  4. 2026From Secure Agentic AI to Secure Agentic Web: Challenges, Threats, and Future Directions
  5. 2025WASP: Benchmarking Web Agent Security Against Prompt Injection Attacks
  6. 2026AgentTrust: Runtime Safety Evaluation and Interception for AI Agent Tool Use
  7. 2026The Attack and Defense Landscape of Agentic AI: A Comprehensive Survey
  8. 2026Agent Skills in the Wild: An Empirical Study of Security Vulnerabilities at Scale