mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Monitor and Recover: A Paradigm for Future Research on Distribution Shift in Learning-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systems

arXiv 2504.13484 ↗First posted 18 Apr 2025cs.LG cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the known vulnerability of neural networks to distribution shift, maintaining reliability in learning-enabled cyber-physical systems poses a salient challenge. In response, many existing methods adopt a detect and abstain methodology, aiming to detect distribution shift at inference time so that the learning-enabled component can abstain from decision-making. This approach, however, has limited use in real-world applications. We instead propose a monitor and recover paradigm as a promising direction for future research. This philosophy emphasizes 1) robust safety monitoring instead of distribution shift detection and 2) distribution shift recovery instead of abstention. We discuss two examples from our recent work.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2025.

Builds on

17 of 20 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  2. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
  3. 2017CyCADA: Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 1,082
  4. 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,054
  5. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
  6. 2021Domain Generalization with MixStylecited by 566
  7. 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 525
  8. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 520
  9. 2016Unsupervised Pixel-Level Domain Adaptation with Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 308
  10. 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 243
  11. 2022Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoderscited by 212
  12. 2019Diagnosing Bottlenecks in Deep Q-learning Algorithmscited by 73
5 more
  1. 2020Greedy Policy Search: A Simple Baseline for Learnable Test-Time Augmentationcited by 61
  2. 2022Conformal Prediction for STL Runtime Verificationcited by 35
  3. 2022iDECODe: In-distribution Equivariance for Conformal Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 27
  4. 2023Robust Conformal Prediction for STL Runtime Verification under Distribution Shiftcited by 15
  5. 2023DC4L: Distribution Shift Recovery via Data-Driven Control for Deep Learning Modelscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.