DC4L: Distribution Shift Recovery via Data-Driven Control for Deep Learning Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks have repeatedly been shown to be non-robust to the uncertainties of the real world, even to naturally occurring ones. A vast majority of current approaches have focused on data-augmentation methods to expand the range of perturbations that the classifier is exposed to while training. A relatively unexplored avenue that is equally promising involves sanitizing an image as a preprocessing step, depending on the nature of perturbation. In this paper, we propose to use control for learned models to recover from distribution shifts online. Specifically, our method applies a sequence of semantic-preserving transformations to bring the shifted data closer in distribution to the training set, as measured by the Wasserstein distance. Our approach is to 1) formulate the problem of distribution shift recovery as a Markov decision process, which we solve using reinforcement learning, 2) identify a minimum condition on the data for our method to be applied, which we check online using a binary classifier, and 3) employ dimensionality reduction through orthonormal projection to aid in our estimates of the Wasserstein distance. We provide theoretical evidence that orthonormal projection preserves characteristics of the data at the distributional level. We apply our distribution shift recovery approach to the ImageNet-C benchmark for distribution shifts, demonstrating an improvement in average accuracy of up to 14.21% across a variety of state-of-the-art ImageNet classifiers. We further show that our method generalizes to composites of shifts from the ImageNet-C benchmark, achieving improvements in average accuracy of up to 9.81%. Finally, we test our method on CIFAR-100-C and report improvements of up to 8.25%.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2023.
Builds on
29 of 45 references.
References · 29
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2016Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 1,898
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
- 2016Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoisingcited by 1,352
- 2017CyCADA: Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 1,079
- 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
17 more
- 2021Multi-Stage Progressive Image Restorationcited by 813
- 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 520
- 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 517
- 2017Training Confidence-calibrated Classifiers for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samplescited by 389
- 2020Learning Enriched Features for Real Image Restoration and Enhancementcited by 311
- 2020Puzzle Mix: Exploiting Saliency and Local Statistics for Optimal Mixupcited by 260
- 2021Accuracy on the Line: On the Strong Correlation Between Out-of-Distribution and In-Distribution Generalizationcited by 248
- 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 240
- 2022Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoderscited by 208
- 2015On Wasserstein Two Sample Testing and Related Families of Nonparametric Testscited by 165
- 2022Learning Enriched Features for Fast Image Restoration and Enhancementcited by 150
- 2022Deep Image Deblurring: A Surveycited by 94
- 2022Agreement-on-the-Line: Predicting the Performance of Neural Networks under Distribution Shiftcited by 94
- 2021Test-Time Adaptation to Distribution Shift by Confidence Maximization and Input Transformationcited by 67
- 2020Greedy Policy Search: A Simple Baseline for Learnable Test-Time Augmentationcited by 61
- 2020Learning Loss for Test-Time Augmentationcited by 56
- 2020Why do classifier accuracies show linear trends under distribution shift?cited by 21
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024Conformalized Credal Regions for Classification with Ambiguous Ground Truthcited by 19
- 2023IBCL: Zero-shot Model Generation under Stability-Plasticity Trade-offscited by 5
- 2024Imprecise Markov Semigroups and their Ergodicitycited by 3
- 2024AR-Pro: Counterfactual Explanations for Anomaly Repair with Formal Propertiescited by 1
- 2023Lights out: training RL agents robust to temporary blindnesscited by 0
- 2024Optimal Transport for ε-Contaminated Credal Sets: To the Memory of Sayan Mukherjeecited by 0
- 2025Monitor and Recover: A Paradigm for Future Research on Distribution Shift in Learning-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 0
- 2025Monitor and Recover: A Paradigm for Future Research on Distribution Shift in Learning-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systems18 Apr 2025
- 2024Conformalized Credal Regions for Classification with Ambiguous Ground Truth7 Nov 2024
- 2024AR-Pro: Counterfactual Explanations for Anomaly Repair with Formal Properties31 Oct 2024
- 2024Optimal Transport for ε-Contaminated Credal Sets: To the Memory of Sayan Mukherjee4 Oct 2024
- 2024Imprecise Markov Semigroups and their Ergodicity30 Apr 2024
- 2023Lights out: training RL agents robust to temporary blindness5 Dec 2023
- 2023IBCL: Zero-shot Model Generation under Stability-Plasticity Trade-offs24 May 2023