mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Counterfactual Inference under Thompson Sampling

arXiv 2504.08773 ↗First posted 3 Apr 2025cs.IR cs.LG stat.MEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recommender systems exemplify sequential decision-making under uncertainty, strategically deciding what content to serve to users, to optimise a range of potential objectives. To balance the explore-exploit trade-off successfully, Thompson sampling provides a natural and widespread paradigm to probabilistically select which action to take. Questions of causal and counterfactual inference, which underpin use-cases like offline evaluation, are not straightforward to answer in these contexts. Specifically, whilst most existing estimators rely on action propensities, these are not readily available under Thompson sampling procedures. We derive exact and efficiently computable expressions for action propensities under a variety of parameter and outcome distributions, enabling the use of off-policy estimators in Thompson sampling scenarios. This opens up a range of practical use-cases where counterfactual inference is crucial, including unbiased offline evaluation of recommender systems, as well as general applications of causal inference in online advertising, personalisation, and beyond.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2025.

Builds on

26 of 69 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 433
  2. 2018Top-K Off-Policy Correction for a REINFORCE Recommender Systemcited by 182
  3. 2015Doubly Robust Policy Evaluation and Optimizationcited by 158
  4. 2016Unbiased Learning-to-Rank with Biased Feedbackcited by 157
  5. 2018More Robust Doubly Robust Off-policy Evaluationcited by 141
  6. 2020Neural Thompson Samplingcited by 128
  7. 2018Offline A/B testing for Recommender Systemscited by 96
  8. 2019Doubly robust off-policy evaluation with shrinkagecited by 87
  9. 2020Open Bandit Dataset and Pipeline: Towards Realistic and Reproducible Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 77
  10. 2022Off-Policy Evaluation for Large Action Spaces via Embeddingscited by 54
  11. 2022Causal Inference in Recommender Systems: A Survey and Future Directionscited by 44
  12. 2021Universal Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 43
14 more
  1. 2023Off-Policy Evaluation for Large Action Spaces via Conjunct Effect Modelingcited by 34
  2. 2020Carousel Personalization in Music Streaming Apps with Contextual Banditscited by 26
  3. 2022PAC-Bayesian Offline Contextual Bandits With Guaranteescited by 20
  4. 2021Deep Exploration for Recommendation Systemscited by 14
  5. 2023On (Normalised) Discounted Cumulative Gain as an Off-Policy Evaluation Metric for Top-n Recommendationcited by 13
  6. 2024Optimal Baseline Corrections for Off-Policy Contextual Banditscited by 13
  7. 2023Ad-load Balancing via Off-policy Learning in a Content Marketplacecited by 12
  8. 2024Multi-Objective Recommendation via Multivariate Policy Learningcited by 10
  9. 2023Practical Bandits: An Industry Perspectivecited by 9
  10. 2024Delta-rm OPE: Off-Policy Estimation with Pairs of Policiescited by 9
  11. 2023A Probabilistic Position Bias Model for Short-Video Recommendation Feedscited by 7
  12. 2024Practical and Robust Safety Guarantees for Advanced Counterfactual Learning to Rankcited by 7
  13. 2024Learning Metrics that Maximise Power for Accelerated A/B-Testscited by 6
  14. 2021Dynamic Slate Recommendation with Gated Recurrent Units and Thompson Samplingcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.