mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Practical and Robust Safety Guarantees for Advanced Counterfactual Learning to Rank

arXiv 2407.19943 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2024cs.LG cs.IRcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Counterfactual learning to rank (CLTR) can be risky and, in various circumstances, can produce sub-optimal models that hurt performance when deployed. Safe CLTR was introduced to mitigate these risks when using inverse propensity scoring to correct for position bias. However, the existing safety measure for CLTR is not applicable to state-of-the-art CLTR methods, cannot handle trust bias, and relies on specific assumptions about user behavior. Our contributions are two-fold. First, we generalize the existing safe CLTR approach to make it applicable to state-of-the-art doubly robust CLTR and trust bias. Second, we propose a novel approach, proximal ranking policy optimization (PRPO), that provides safety in deployment without assumptions about user behavior. PRPO removes incentives for learning ranking behavior that is too dissimilar to a safe ranking model. Thereby, PRPO imposes a limit on how much learned models can degrade performance metrics, without relying on any specific user assumptions. Our experiments show that both our novel safe doubly robust method and PRPO provide higher performance than the existing safe inverse propensity scoring approach. However, in unexpected circumstances, the safe doubly robust approach can become unsafe and bring detrimental performance. In contrast, PRPO always maintains safety, even in maximally adversarial situations. By avoiding assumptions, PRPO is the first method with unconditional safety in deployment that translates to robust safety for real-world applications.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2024.

Builds on

21 of 59 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2016Unbiased Learning-to-Rank with Biased Feedbackcited by 157
  3. 2013Introducing LETOR 4.0 Datasetscited by 121
  4. 2019Truly Proximal Policy Optimizationcited by 69
  5. 2021Generalized Proximal Policy Optimization with Sample Reusecited by 40
  6. 2019Trust Region-Guided Proximal Policy Optimizationcited by 36
  7. 2021Computationally Efficient Optimization of Plackett-Luce Ranking Models for Relevance and Fairnesscited by 36
  8. 2020Correcting for Selection Bias in Learning-to-rank Systemscited by 35
  9. 2023Black-box Adversarial Attacks against Dense Retrieval Models: A Multi-view Contrastive Learning Methodcited by 29
  10. 2022Doubly-Robust Estimation for Correcting Position-Bias in Click Feedback for Unbiased Learning to Rankcited by 18
  11. 2019Policy-Gradient Training of Fair and Unbiased Ranking Functionscited by 16
  12. 2020Unifying Online and Counterfactual Learning to Rankcited by 15
9 more
  1. 2020Safe Exploration for Optimizing Contextual Banditscited by 14
  2. 2020StochasticRank: Global Optimization of Scale-Free Discrete Functionscited by 13
  3. 2022Learning-to-Rank at the Speed of Sampling: Plackett-Luce Gradient Estimation With Minimal Computational Complexitycited by 13
  4. 2024Optimal Baseline Corrections for Off-Policy Contextual Banditscited by 13
  5. 2023Safe Deployment for Counterfactual Learning to Rank with Exposure-Based Risk Minimizationcited by 11
  6. 2022Reaching the End of Unbiasedness: Uncovering Implicit Limitations of Click-Based Learning to Rankcited by 10
  7. 2021Robust Generalization and Safe Query-Specialization in Counterfactual Learning to Rankcited by 6
  8. 2020Learning from User Interactions with Rankings: A Unification of the Fieldcited by 5
  9. 2024A First Look at Selection Bias in Preference Elicitation for Recommendationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5.

7 papers.