mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

EnrichIndex: Using LLMs to Enrich Retrieval Indices Offline

arXiv 2504.03598 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.IRcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing information retrieval systems excel in cases where the language of target documents closely matches that of the user query. However, real-world retrieval systems are often required to implicitly reason whether a document is relevant. For example, when retrieving technical texts or tables, their relevance to the user query may be implied through a particular jargon or structure, rather than explicitly expressed in their content. Large language models (LLMs) hold great potential in identifying such implied relevance by leveraging their reasoning skills. Nevertheless, current LLM-augmented retrieval is hindered by high latency and computation cost, as the LLM typically computes the query-document relevance online, for every query anew. To tackle this issue we introduce EnrichIndex, a retrieval approach which instead uses the LLM offline to build semantically-enriched retrieval indices, by performing a single pass over all documents in the retrieval corpus once during ingestion time. Furthermore, the semantically-enriched indices can complement existing online retrieval approaches, boosting the performance of LLM re-rankers. We evaluated EnrichIndex on five retrieval tasks, involving passages and tables, and found that it outperforms strong online LLM-based retrieval systems, with an average improvement of 11.7 points in recall @ 10 and 10.6 points in NDCG @ 10 compared to strong baselines. In terms of online calls to the LLM, it processes 293.3 times fewer tokens which greatly reduces the online latency and cost. Overall, EnrichIndex is an effective way to build better retrieval indices offline by leveraging the strong reasoning skills of LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2025.

Builds on

14 of 19 references.

References · 14

  1. 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 640
  2. 2024Spider 2.0: Evaluating Language Models on Real-World Enterprise Text-to-SQL Workflowscited by 232
  3. 2024BRIGHT: A Realistic and Challenging Benchmark for Reasoning-Intensive Retrievalcited by 158
  4. 2020Break It Down: A Question Understanding Benchmarkcited by 131
  5. 2022Re2G: Retrieve, Rerank, Generatecited by 102
  6. 2023AnglE-optimized Text Embeddingscited by 99
  7. 2023Answering Questions by Meta-Reasoning over Multiple Chains of Thoughtcited by 87
  8. 2024Arctic-Embed 2.0: Multilingual Retrieval Without Compromisecited by 58
  9. 2024BEAVER: An Enterprise Benchmark for Text-to-SQLcited by 42
  10. 2024JudgeRank: Leveraging Large Language Models for Reasoning-Intensive Rerankingcited by 34
  11. 2024Is Table Retrieval a Solved Problem? Exploring Join-Aware Multi-Table Retrievalcited by 27
  12. 2025Guiding Retrieval using LLM-based Listwise Rankerscited by 16
2 more
  1. 2025Can we Retrieve Everything All at Once? ARM: An Alignment-Oriented LLM-based Retrieval Methodcited by 10
  2. 2024BMX: Entropy-weighted Similarity and Semantic-enhanced Lexical Searchcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 12.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025InsertRank: LLMs can reason over BM25 scores to Improve Listwise Reranking
  2. 2026Beyond Relevance: Utility-Centric Retrieval in the LLM Era
  3. 2025LLM4Ranking: An Easy-to-use Framework of Utilizing Large Language Models for Document Reranking
  4. 2025ExpandR: Teaching Dense Retrievers Beyond Queries with LLM Guidance
  5. 2023RETA-LLM: A Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model Toolkit
  6. 2023Large Search Model: Redefining Search Stack in the Era of LLMs
  7. 2025Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Two-Stage Retrieval: FlashRank Reranking and Query Expansion
  8. 2024Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and Beyond: A Comprehensive Survey on How to Make your LLMs use External Data More Wisely