mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Guiding Retrieval using LLM-based Listwise Rankers

arXiv 2501.09186 ↗First posted 15 Jan 2025cs.IR cs.AIcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong promise as rerankers, especially in ``listwise'' settings where an LLM is prompted to rerank several search results at once. However, this ``cascading'' retrieve-and-rerank approach is limited by the bounded recall problem: relevant documents not retrieved initially are permanently excluded from the final ranking. Adaptive retrieval techniques address this problem, but do not work with listwise rerankers because they assume a document's score is computed independently from other documents. In this paper, we propose an adaptation of an existing adaptive retrieval method that supports the listwise setting and helps guide the retrieval process itself (thereby overcoming the bounded recall problem for LLM rerankers). Specifically, our proposed algorithm merges results both from the initial ranking and feedback documents provided by the most relevant documents seen up to that point. Through extensive experiments across diverse LLM rerankers, first stage retrievers, and feedback sources, we demonstrate that our method can improve nDCG@10 by up to 13.23% and recall by 28.02%--all while keeping the total number of LLM inferences constant and overheads due to the adaptive process minimal. The work opens the door to leveraging LLM-based search in settings where the initial pool of results is limited, e.g., by legacy systems, or by the cost of deploying a semantic first-stage.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2025.

Builds on

23 of 38 references.

References · 23

  1. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
  2. 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,160
  3. 2016Efficient and robust approximate nearest neighbor search using Hierarchical Navigable Small World graphscited by 853
  4. 2023Extending Context Window of Large Language Models via Positional Interpolationcited by 721
  5. 2020Document Ranking with a Pretrained Sequence-to-Sequence Modelcited by 373
  6. 2023Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agentscited by 356
  7. 2023Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Promptingcited by 302
  8. 2023Fine-Tuning LLaMA for Multi-Stage Text Retrievalcited by 271
  9. 2023RankZephyr: Effective and Robust Zero-Shot Listwise Reranking is a Breeze!cited by 151
  10. 2023Zero-Shot Listwise Document Reranking with a Large Language Modelcited by 81
  11. 2023RankVicuna: Zero-Shot Listwise Document Reranking with Open-Source Large Language Modelscited by 69
  12. 2024FollowIR: Evaluating and Teaching Information Retrieval Models to Follow Instructionscited by 67
11 more
  1. 2023Scaling Down, LiTting Up: Efficient Zero-Shot Listwise Reranking with Seq2seq Encoder-Decoder Modelscited by 26
  2. 2022Adaptive Re-Ranking with a Corpus Graphcited by 23
  3. 2023Generative Relevance Feedback with Large Language Modelscited by 19
  4. 2023A Unified Framework for Learned Sparse Retrievalcited by 17
  5. 2024Top-Down Partitioning for Efficient List-Wise Rankingcited by 13
  6. 2023Generative and Pseudo-Relevant Feedback for Sparse, Dense and Learned Sparse Retrievalcited by 9
  7. 2024A Reproducibility Study of PLAIDcited by 8
  8. 2024rerankers: A Lightweight Python Library to Unify Ranking Methodscited by 8
  9. 2023Lexically-Accelerated Dense Retrievalcited by 7
  10. 2024An Investigation of Prompt Variations for Zero-shot LLM-based Rankerscited by 7
  11. 2024Quam: Adaptive Retrieval through Query Affinity Modellingcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 10; 2026: 6.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: