mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CORE-T: COherent REtrieval of Tables for Text-to-SQL

arXiv 2601.13111 ↗First posted 19 Jan 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.IRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Realistic text-to-SQL workflows often require joining multiple tables. As a result, accurately retrieving the relevant set of tables becomes a key bottleneck for end-to-end performance. We study an open-book setting where queries must be answered over large, heterogeneous table collections pooled from many sources, without clean scoping signals such as database identifiers. Here, dense retrieval (DR) achieves high recall but returns many distractors, while join-aware alternatives often rely on extra assumptions and/or incur high inference overhead. We propose CORE-T, a scalable, training-free framework that enriches tables with LLM-generated purpose metadata and pre-computes a lightweight table-compatibility cache. At inference time, DR returns top-K candidates; a single LLM call selects a coherent, joinable subset, and a two-step additive adjustment stage restores strongly compatible tables. Across Bird, Spider, MMQA, and Beaver, CORE-T improves over DR by up to 22.7 points in table-selection F1 while returning up to 40% fewer tables, and by up to 24.4 points in multi-table execution accuracy, and uses 1.64-4.20x fewer total selection tokens than LLM-intensive baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2026.

Builds on

20 of 52 references.

References · 20

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  3. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  4. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
  5. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,139
  6. 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 688
  7. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 687
  8. 2024Spider 2.0: Evaluating Language Models on Real-World Enterprise Text-to-SQL Workflowscited by 232
  9. 2021KaggleDBQA: Realistic Evaluation of Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 106
  10. 2021Open Domain Question Answering over Tables via Dense Retrievalcited by 74
  11. 2024Arctic-Embed 2.0: Multilingual Retrieval Without Compromisecited by 58
  12. 2024BEAVER: An Enterprise Benchmark for Text-to-SQLcited by 42
8 more
  1. 2024Is Table Retrieval a Solved Problem? Exploring Join-Aware Multi-Table Retrievalcited by 27
  2. 2020Table Search Using a Deep Contextualized Language Modelcited by 22
  3. 2025EnrichIndex: Using LLMs to Enrich Retrieval Indices Offlinecited by 15
  4. 2022WarpGate: A Semantic Join Discovery System for Cloud Data Warehousescited by 13
  5. 2022Table Retrieval May Not Necessitate Table-specific Model Designcited by 11
  6. 2025Can we Retrieve Everything All at Once? ARM: An Alignment-Oriented LLM-based Retrieval Methodcited by 10
  7. 2025Auto-Prep: Holistic Prediction of Data Preparation Steps for Self-Service Business Intelligencecited by 5
  8. 2025REaR: Retrieve, Expand and Refine for Effective Multitable Retrievalcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.