mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating Compositional Scene Understanding in Multimodal Generative Models

arXiv 2503.23125 ↗First posted 29 Mar 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 5

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

The visual world is fundamentally compositional. Visual scenes are defined by the composition of objects and their relations. Hence, it is essential for computer vision systems to reflect and exploit this compositionality to achieve robust and generalizable scene understanding. While major strides have been made toward the development of general-purpose, multimodal generative models, including both text-to-image models and multimodal vision-language models, it remains unclear whether these systems are capable of accurately generating and interpreting scenes involving the composition of multiple objects and relations. In this work, we present an evaluation of the compositional visual processing capabilities in the current generation of text-to-image (DALL-E 3) and multimodal vision-language models (GPT-4V, GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 3.5, QWEN2-VL-72B, and InternVL2.5-38B), and compare the performance of these systems to human participants. The results suggest that these systems display some ability to solve compositional and relational tasks, showing notable improvements over the previous generation of multimodal models, but with performance nevertheless well below the level of human participants, particularly for more complex scenes involving many (>5) objects and multiple relations. These results highlight the need for further progress toward compositional understanding of visual scenes.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 31 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Mar 2025.

Builds on

31 of 46 references.

References · 31

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  4. 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,585
  5. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,656
  6. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  7. 2020Object-Centric Learning with Slot Attentioncited by 876
  8. 2019MONet: Unsupervised Scene Decomposition and Representationcited by 392
  9. 2022Emergent Analogical Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 240
  10. 2020On the Binding Problem in Artificial Neural Networkscited by 233
  11. 2021Partial success in closing the gap between human and machine visioncited by 185
  12. 2018Measuring abstract reasoning in neural networkscited by 166
19 more
  1. 2024Vision language models are blind: Failing to translate detailed visual features into wordscited by 147
  2. 2022Does CLIP Bind Concepts? Probing Compositionality in Large Image Modelscited by 102
  3. 2022A very preliminary analysis of DALL-E 2cited by 82
  4. 2024Understanding the Limits of Vision Language Models Through the Lens of the Binding Problemcited by 75
  5. 2020Attention over learned object embeddings enables complex visual reasoningcited by 59
  6. 2022Testing Relational Understanding in Text-Guided Image Generationcited by 59
  7. 2023Comparing Humans, GPT-4, and GPT-4V On Abstraction and Reasoning Taskscited by 55
  8. 2023Prompting is not a substitute for probability measurements in large language modelscited by 44
  9. 2024Using Counterfactual Tasks to Evaluate the Generality of Analogical Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 38
  10. 2023An Early Evaluation of GPT-4V(ision)cited by 31
  11. 2024KiVA: Kid-inspired Visual Analogies for Testing Large Multimodal Modelscited by 24
  12. 2023Systematic Visual Reasoning through Object-Centric Relational Abstractioncited by 20
  13. 2023Learning to reason over visual objectscited by 19
  14. 2024Evidence from counterfactual tasks supports emergent analogical reasoning in large language modelscited by 14
  15. 2022GAMR: A Guided Attention Model for (visual) Reasoningcited by 12
  16. 2024Slot Abstractors: Toward Scalable Abstract Visual Reasoningcited by 11
  17. 2021Solving the Same-Different Task with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 10
  18. 2021Recurrent Vision Transformer for Solving Visual Reasoning Problemscited by 9
  19. 2024Relations, Negations, and Numbers: Looking for Logic in Generative Text-to-Image Modelscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Prompting Large Vision-Language Models for Compositional Reasoning
  2. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?
  3. 2024MMCOMPOSITION: Revisiting the Compositionality of Pre-trained Vision-Language Models
  4. 2023An Examination of the Compositionality of Large Generative Vision-Language Models
  5. 2024In-Context Learning Improves Compositional Understanding of Vision-Language Models
  6. 2023T2I-CompBench++: An Enhanced and Comprehensive Benchmark for Compositional Text-to-image Generation
  7. 2026A Model-Internal Protocol for Assessing Multimodal Models as Integrated Systems
  8. 2025Explain Before You Answer: A Survey on Compositional Visual Reasoning