Binding Visual Features Point by Point
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite success on standard benchmarks, vision language models display persistent failures on tasks involving processing of multi-object scenes, including many tasks that are relatively easy for humans. Recent work has found that these failures may stem from a basic inability to accurately bind object features in-context, a challenge that is referred to as the "binding problem" in cognitive science and neuroscience. The human visual system is thought to solve this binding problem via serial processing, attending to individual objects one at a time so as to avoid interference from other objects. Recent work has proposed "pointing" -- the use of explicit spatial coordinates to refer to objects -- as an analogous solution for vision language models, and found that it improves performance on challenging multi-object tasks. However, it is unclear textitwhy (i.e., on a mechanistic or representational level) this approach improves performance, and how directly this relates to serial processing in human vision. Here, we investigate this question. We find that learning to point-via-text induces an internal visual search routine, and we characterize the mechanisms that support this procedure. We also find that pointing behavior can be generalized to new tasks via fine-tuning, and that doing so eliminates binding errors and enables compositional generalization. These results provide a proof-of-principle that serial processing can solve the binding problem for vision language models just as it does for biological vision.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 26 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.
Builds on
26 of 48 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 25
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,585
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
- 2021Pix2seq: A Language Modeling Framework for Object Detectioncited by 349
- 2013Direct and Indirect Effectscited by 280
- 2020On the Binding Problem in Artificial Neural Networkscited by 233
13 more
- 2021UniTAB: Unifying Text and Box Outputs for Grounded Vision-Language Modelingcited by 122
- 2025Grounded Reinforcement Learning for Visual Reasoningcited by 83
- 2024Understanding the Limits of Vision Language Models Through the Lens of the Binding Problemcited by 75
- 2022Testing Relational Understanding in Text-Guided Image Generationcited by 59
- 2023Comparing Humans, GPT-4, and GPT-4V On Abstraction and Reasoning Taskscited by 55
- 2023Break It Down: Evidence for Structural Compositionality in Neural Networkscited by 44
- 2025Emergent Symbolic Mechanisms Support Abstract Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 31
- 2025Visual symbolic mechanisms: Emergent symbol processing in vision language modelscited by 13
- 2025Object-centric Binding in Contrastive Language-Image Pretrainingcited by 12
- 2025Whither symbols in the era of advanced neural networks?cited by 7
- 2023Improving Planning with Large Language Models: A Modular Agentic Architecturecited by 5
- 2025Evaluating Compositional Scene Understanding in Multimodal Generative Modelscited by 5
- 2025Bound by semanticity: universal laws governing the generalization-identification tradeoffcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Point What You Mean: Visually Grounded Instruction Policy
- 2026Getting to the Point: Pointing Improves LVLMs at Counting
- 2025Poivre: Self-Refining Visual Pointing with Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Point-It-Out: Benchmarking Embodied Reasoning for Vision Language Models in Multi-Stage Visual Grounding
- 2026PointVG-R: Internalizing Geometric Reasoning in MLLMs for Precise Pointing Localization via Visual Chain of Thought
- 2026The Dual Mechanisms of Spatial Variable Binding in Vision-Language Models
- 2026Seeing to Generalize: How Visual Data Corrects Binding Shortcuts
- 2025Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models