mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Solving the Same-Different Task with Convolutional Neural Networks

arXiv 2101.09129 ↗First posted 22 Jan 2021cs.CVcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning demonstrated major abilities in solving many kinds of different real-world problems in computer vision literature. However, they are still strained by simple reasoning tasks that humans consider easy to solve. In this work, we probe current state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks on a difficult set of tasks known as the same-different problems. All the problems require the same prerequisite to be solved correctly: understanding if two random shapes inside the same image are the same or not. With the experiments carried out in this work, we demonstrate that residual connections, and more generally the skip connections, seem to have only a marginal impact on the learning of the proposed problems. In particular, we experiment with DenseNets, and we examine the contribution of residual and recurrent connections in already tested architectures, ResNet-18, and CorNet-S respectively. Our experiments show that older feed-forward networks, AlexNet and VGG, are almost unable to learn the proposed problems, except in some specific scenarios. We show that recently introduced architectures can converge even in the cases where the important parts of their architecture are removed. We finally carry out some zero-shot generalization tests, and we discover that in these scenarios residual and recurrent connections can have a stronger impact on the overall test accuracy. On four difficult problems from the SVRT dataset, we can reach state-of-the-art results with respect to the previous approaches, obtaining super-human performances on three of the four problems.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2021.

Builds on

10 of 20 references.

References · 10

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  3. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  4. 2017A simple neural network module for relational reasoningcited by 345
  5. 2019RAVEN: A Dataset for Relational and Analogical Visual rEasoNingcited by 225
  6. 2018Measuring abstract reasoning in neural networkscited by 165
  7. 2017Inferring and Executing Programs for Visual Reasoningcited by 130
  8. 2018Transparency by Design: Closing the Gap Between Performance and Interpretability in Visual Reasoningcited by 51
  9. 2018A Dataset and Architecture for Visual Reasoning with a Working Memorycited by 12
  10. 201625 years of CNNs: Can we compare to human abstraction capabilities?cited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

10 papers.