Benchmarking Post-Hoc Unknown-Category Detection in Food Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Food recognition models often struggle to distinguish between seen and unseen samples, frequently misclassifying samples from unseen categories by assigning them an in-distribution (ID) label. This misclassification presents significant challenges when deploying these models in real-world applications, particularly within automatic dietary assessment systems, where incorrect labels can lead to cascading errors throughout the system. Ideally, such models should prompt the user when an unknown sample is encountered, allowing for corrective action. Given no prior research exploring food recognition in real-world settings, in this work we conduct an empirical analysis of various post-hoc out-of-distribution (OOD) detection methods for fine-grained food recognition. Our findings indicate that virtual logit matching (ViM) performed the best overall, likely due to its combination of logits and feature-space representations. Additionally, our work reinforces prior notions in the OOD domain, noting that models with higher ID accuracy performed better across the evaluated OOD detection methods. Furthermore, transformer-based architectures consistently outperformed convolution-based models in detecting OOD samples across various methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2025.
Builds on
22 of 45 references.
References · 22
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
- 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
- 2015Towards Open Set Deep Networkscited by 533
- 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
- 2019Scaling Out-of-Distribution Detection for Real-World Settingscited by 465
- 2020Generalized ODIN: Detecting Out-of-distribution Image without Learning from Out-of-distribution Datacited by 408
10 more
- 2022ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matchingcited by 404
- 2017Training Confidence-calibrated Classifiers for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samplescited by 389
- 2021Exploring the Limits of Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 283
- 2021DICE: Leveraging Sparsification for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 166
- 2021Large Scale Visual Food Recognitioncited by 75
- 2021Contrastive Out-of-Distribution Detection for Pretrained Transformerscited by 70
- 2020ISIA Food-500: A Dataset for Large-Scale Food Recognition via Stacked Global-Local Attention Networkcited by 47
- 2019FoodX-251: A Dataset for Fine-grained Food Classificationcited by 33
- 2024Are We Ready for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Digital Pathology?cited by 8
- 2022Object Detection in Indian Food Platters using Transfer Learning with YOLOv4cited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.