Restoring Forgotten Knowledge in Non-Exemplar Class Incremental Learning through Test-Time Semantic Evolution
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Continual learning aims to accumulate knowledge over a data stream while mitigating catastrophic forgetting. In Non-exemplar Class Incremental Learning (NECIL), forgetting arises during incremental optimization because old classes are inaccessible, hindering the retention of prior knowledge. To solve this, previous methods struggle in achieving the stability-plasticity balance in the training stages. However, we note that the testing stage is rarely considered among them, but is promising to be a solution to forgetting. Therefore, we propose RoSE, which is a simple yet effective method that Restores forgotten knowledge through test-time Semantic Evolution. Specifically designed for minimizing forgetting, RoSE is a test-time semantic drift compensation framework that enables more accurate drift estimation in a self-supervised manner. Moreover, to avoid incomplete optimization during online testing, we derive an analytical solution as an alternative to gradient descent. We evaluate RoSE on CIFAR-100, TinyImageNet, and ImageNet100 datasets, under both cold-start and warm-start settings. Our method consistently outperforms most state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods across various scenarios, validating the potential and feasibility of test-time evolution in NECIL.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2025.
Builds on
30 of 46 references.
References · 30
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,333
- 2017Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replaycited by 1,158
- 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,105
- 2017PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruningcited by 898
- 2019Large Scale Incremental Learningcited by 732
18 more
- 2018Overcoming catastrophic forgetting with hard attention to the taskcited by 681
- 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 525
- 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
- 2017PathNet: Evolution Channels Gradient Descent in Super Neural Networkscited by 364
- 2021Rainbow Memory: Continual Learning with a Memory of Diverse Samplescited by 273
- 2020Semantic Drift Compensation for Class-Incremental Learningcited by 241
- 2022Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoderscited by 212
- 2018Rotate your Networks: Better Weight Consolidation and Less Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 127
- 2022FeTrIL: Feature Translation for Exemplar-Free Class-Incremental Learningcited by 121
- 2022Self-Sustaining Representation Expansion for Non-Exemplar Class-Incremental Learningcited by 118
- 2023FeCAM: Exploiting the Heterogeneity of Class Distributions in Exemplar-Free Continual Learningcited by 87
- 2023DELTA: degradation-free fully test-time adaptationcited by 72
- 2024Elastic Feature Consolidation for Cold Start Exemplar-Free Incremental Learningcited by 37
- 2024Resurrecting Old Classes with New Data for Exemplar-Free Continual Learningcited by 33
- 2024Exemplar-free Continual Representation Learning via Learnable Drift Compensationcited by 31
- 2024Early Preparation Pays Off: New Classifier Pre-tuning for Class Incremental Semantic Segmentationcited by 7
- 2024Dual-Phase Continual Learning: Supervised Adaptation Meets Unsupervised Retentioncited by 6
- 2023Enhancing Plasticity for First Session Adaptation Continual Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.