PAUSE: Low-Latency and Privacy-Aware Active User Selection for Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning (FL) enables multiple edge devices to collaboratively train a machine learning model without the need to share potentially private data. Federated learning proceeds through iterative exchanges of model updates, which pose two key challenges: First, the accumulation of privacy leakage over time, and second, communication latency. These two limitations are typically addressed separately: The former via perturbed updates to enhance privacy and the latter using user selection to mitigate latency - both at the expense of accuracy. In this work, we propose a method that jointly addresses the accumulation of privacy leakage and communication latency via active user selection, aiming to improve the trade-off among privacy, latency, and model performance. To achieve this, we construct a reward function that accounts for these three objectives. Building on this reward, we propose a multi-armed bandit (MAB)-based algorithm, termed Privacy-aware Active User SElection (PAUSE) which dynamically selects a subset of users each round while ensuring bounded overall privacy leakage. We establish a theoretical analysis, systematically showing that the reward growth rate of PAUSE follows that of the best-known rate in MAB literature. To address the complexity overhead of active user selection, we propose a simulated annealing-based relaxation of PAUSE and analyze its ability to approximate the reward-maximizing policy under reduced complexity. We numerically validate the privacy leakage, associated improved latency, and accuracy gains of our methods for the federated training in various scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2025.
Builds on
41 of 68 references.
References · 41
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
- 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 832
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 536
- 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 382
- 2019FedPAQ: A Communication-Efficient Federated Learning Method with Periodic Averaging and Quantizationcited by 356
- 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 326
- 2019Asynchronous Federated Optimizationcited by 267
- 2018The Convergence of Sparsified Gradient Methodscited by 229
29 more
- 2018Federated Learning via Over-the-Air Computationcited by 219
- 2021Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learningcited by 196
- 2018Distributed Differential Privacy via Shufflingcited by 115
- 2020UVeQFed: Universal Vector Quantization for Federated Learningcited by 107
- 2020Client Selection and Bandwidth Allocation in Wireless Federated Learning Networks: A Long-Term Perspectivecited by 103
- 2021Clustered Sampling: Low-Variance and Improved Representativity for Clients Selection in Federated Learningcited by 93
- 2020Adaptive Gradient Sparsification for Efficient Federated Learning: An Online Learning Approachcited by 81
- 2019The Privacy Blanket of the Shuffle Modelcited by 74
- 2020LDP-FL: Practical Private Aggregation in Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacycited by 64
- 2019On Analog Gradient Descent Learning over Multiple Access Fading Channelscited by 62
- 2020An Efficiency-boosting Client Selection Scheme for Federated Learning with Fairness Guaranteecited by 62
- 2022Client Selection in Federated Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 62
- 2020Multi-Armed Bandit Based Client Scheduling for Federated Learningcited by 57
- 2020Federated learning with class imbalance reductioncited by 52
- 2021Federated Learning: A Signal Processing Perspectivecited by 49
- 2020Stochastic Client Selection for Federated Learning with Volatile Clientscited by 39
- 2021Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacy: Trade-offs between Privacy, Utility, and Communicationcited by 39
- 2022Joint Privacy Enhancement and Quantization in Federated Learningcited by 35
- 2021Private Federated Learning Without a Trusted Server: Optimal Algorithms for Convex Lossescited by 30
- 2020A Comprehensive Survey on Local Differential Privacy Toward Data Statistics and Analysiscited by 26
- 2020Federated Learning under Importance Samplingcited by 26
- 2021DP-SIGNSGD: When Efficiency Meets Privacy and Robustnesscited by 11
- 2023Asynchronous Federated Learning with Bidirectional Quantized Communications and Buffered Aggregationcited by 10
- 2017Adaptive Exploration-Exploitation Tradeoff for Opportunistic Banditscited by 8
- 2023Client Selection for Generalization in Accelerated Federated Learning: A Multi-Armed Bandit Approachcited by 8
- 2023Compressed Private Aggregation for Scalable and Robust Federated Learning over Massive Networkscited by 5
- 2023Dynamic Privacy Allocation for Locally Differentially Private Federated Learning with Composite Objectivescited by 5
- 2024Stragglers-Aware Low-Latency Synchronous Federated Learning via Layer-Wise Model Updatescited by 4
- 2024FedMABA: Towards Fair Federated Learning through Multi-Armed Bandits Allocationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.