mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MaskSDM with Shapley values to improve flexibility, robustness, and explainability in species distribution modeling

arXiv 2503.13057 ↗First posted 17 Mar 2025cs.LG cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Species Distribution Models (SDMs) play a vital role in biodiversity research, conservation planning, and ecological niche modeling by predicting species distributions based on environmental conditions. The selection of predictors is crucial, strongly impacting both model accuracy and how well the predictions reflect ecological patterns. To ensure meaningful insights, input variables must be carefully chosen to match the study objectives and the ecological requirements of the target species. However, existing SDMs, including both traditional and deep learning-based approaches, often lack key capabilities for variable selection: (i) flexibility to choose relevant predictors at inference without retraining; (ii) robustness to handle missing predictor values without compromising accuracy; and (iii) explainability to interpret and accurately quantify each predictor's contribution. To overcome these limitations, we introduce MaskSDM, a novel deep learning-based SDM that enables flexible predictor selection by employing a masked training strategy. This approach allows the model to make predictions with arbitrary subsets of input variables while remaining robust to missing data. It also provides a clearer understanding of how adding or removing a given predictor affects model performance and predictions. Additionally, MaskSDM leverages Shapley values for precise predictor contribution assessments, improving upon traditional approximations. We evaluate MaskSDM on the global sPlotOpen dataset, modeling the distributions of 12,738 plant species. Our results show that MaskSDM outperforms imputation-based methods and approximates models trained on specific subsets of variables. These findings underscore MaskSDM's potential to increase the applicability and adoption of SDMs, laying the groundwork for developing foundation models in SDMs that can be readily applied to diverse ecological applications.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 111 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2025.

Builds on

30 of 111 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  5. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  6. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  7. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  8. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,238
  9. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
  10. 2017A Structured Self-attentive Sentence Embeddingcited by 318
  11. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 208
  12. 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 200
18 more
  1. 2022On Embeddings for Numerical Features in Tabular Deep Learningcited by 186
  2. 2024The Road Less Scheduledcited by 163
  3. 2023SatCLIP: Global, General-Purpose Location Embeddings with Satellite Imagerycited by 151
  4. 2021Seeing biodiversity: perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservationcited by 130
  5. 20234M: Massively Multimodal Masked Modelingcited by 120
  6. 2023Geographic Location Encoding with Spherical Harmonics and Sinusoidal Representation Networkscited by 61
  7. 2023Spatial Implicit Neural Representations for Global-Scale Species Mappingcited by 59
  8. 2023ReMasker: Imputing Tabular Data with Masked Autoencodingcited by 37
  9. 2023TabMT: Generating tabular data with masked transformerscited by 36
  10. 2023Coarse-to-Fine Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 31
  11. 2024GeoPlant: Spatial Plant Species Prediction Datasetcited by 16
  12. 2023Active Learning-Based Species Range Estimationcited by 13
  13. 2024WildSAT: Learning Satellite Image Representations from Wildlife Observationscited by 13
  14. 2024Combining Observational Data and Language for Species Range Estimationcited by 12
  15. 2021Can We Faithfully Represent Masked States to Compute Shapley Values on a DNN?cited by 10
  16. 2024On the selection and effectiveness of pseudo-absences for species distribution modeling with deep learningcited by 10
  17. 2024Multi-Scale and Multimodal Species Distribution Modelingcited by 3
  18. 2025Feedforward Few-shot Species Range Estimationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.