On the selection and effectiveness of pseudo-absences for species distribution modeling with deep learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Species distribution modeling is a highly versatile tool for understanding the intricate relationship between environmental conditions and species occurrences. However, the available data often lacks information on confirmed species absence and is limited to opportunistically sampled, presence-only observations. To overcome this limitation, a common approach is to employ pseudo-absences, which are specific geographic locations designated as negative samples. While pseudo-absences are well-established for single-species distribution models, their application in the context of multi-species neural networks remains underexplored. Notably, the significant class imbalance between species presences and pseudo-absences is often left unaddressed. Moreover, the existence of different types of pseudo-absences (e.g., random and target-group background points) adds complexity to the selection process. Determining the optimal combination of pseudo-absences types is difficult and depends on the characteristics of the data, particularly considering that certain types of pseudo-absences can be used to mitigate geographic biases. In this paper, we demonstrate that these challenges can be effectively tackled by integrating pseudo-absences in the training of multi-species neural networks through modifications to the loss function. This adjustment involves assigning different weights to the distinct terms of the loss function, thereby addressing both the class imbalance and the choice of pseudo-absence types. Additionally, we propose a strategy to set these loss weights using spatial block cross-validation with presence-only data. We evaluate our approach using a benchmark dataset containing independent presence-absence data from six different regions and report improved results when compared to competing approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2024.
Builds on
15 of 75 references.
References · 15
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 989
- 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
- 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 491
- 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 219
- 2021Seeing biodiversity: perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservationcited by 130
- 2020Distribution-Balanced Loss for Multi-Label Classification in Long-Tailed Datasetscited by 122
- 2019Presence-Only Geographical Priors for Fine-Grained Image Classificationcited by 109
- 2021Multi-Label Learning from Single Positive Labelscited by 81
3 more
- 2023Spatial Implicit Neural Representations for Global-Scale Species Mappingcited by 59
- 2022Acknowledging the Unknown for Multi-label Learning with Single Positive Labelscited by 24
- 2016Deep Multi-Species Embeddingcited by 20
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2024GeoPlant: Spatial Plant Species Prediction Datasetcited by 16
- 2024Imbalance-aware Presence-only Loss Function for Species Distribution Modelingcited by 4
- 2024Generating Binary Species Range Mapscited by 4
- 2024Multi-Scale and Multimodal Species Distribution Modelingcited by 3
- 2025Feedforward Few-shot Species Range Estimationcited by 3
- 2025MaskSDM with Shapley values to improve flexibility, robustness, and explainability in species distribution modelingcited by 3
- 2025CISO: Species Distribution Modeling Conditioned on Incomplete Species Observationscited by 1
- 2024Applying the maximum entropy principle to neural networks enhances multi-species distribution modelscited by 0
- 2025Heterogeneous graph neural networks for species distribution modelingcited by 0
- 2026SAGE: A sampling-aware global evaluation benchmark for species distribution modelingcited by 0
- 2026SAGE: A sampling-aware global evaluation benchmark for species distribution modeling25 Sep 2026
- 2025CISO: Species Distribution Modeling Conditioned on Incomplete Species Observations8 Aug 2025
- 2025MaskSDM with Shapley values to improve flexibility, robustness, and explainability in species distribution modeling17 Mar 2025
- 2025Heterogeneous graph neural networks for species distribution modeling14 Mar 2025
- 2025Feedforward Few-shot Species Range Estimation20 Feb 2025
- 2024Applying the maximum entropy principle to neural networks enhances multi-species distribution models26 Dec 2024
- 2024Multi-Scale and Multimodal Species Distribution Modeling6 Nov 2024
- 2024Generating Binary Species Range Maps28 Aug 2024
- 2024GeoPlant: Spatial Plant Species Prediction Dataset25 Aug 2024
- 2024Imbalance-aware Presence-only Loss Function for Species Distribution Modeling12 Mar 2024