mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CISO: Species Distribution Modeling Conditioned on Incomplete Species Observations

arXiv 2508.06704 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2025cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Species distribution models (SDMs) are widely used to predict species' geographic distributions, serving as critical tools for ecological research and conservation planning. Typically, SDMs relate species occurrences to environmental variables representing abiotic factors, such as temperature, precipitation, and soil properties. However, species distributions are also strongly influenced by biotic interactions with other species, which are often overlooked. While some methods partially address this limitation by incorporating biotic interactions, they often assume symmetrical pairwise relationships between species and require consistent co-occurrence data. In practice, species observations are sparse, and the availability of information about the presence or absence of other species varies significantly across locations. To address these challenges, we propose CISO, a deep learning-based method for species distribution modeling Conditioned on Incomplete Species Observations. CISO enables predictions to be conditioned on a flexible number of species observations alongside environmental variables, accommodating the variability and incompleteness of available biotic data. We demonstrate our approach using three datasets representing different species groups: sPlotOpen for plants, SatBird for birds, and a new dataset, SatButterfly, for butterflies. Our results show that including partial biotic information improves predictive performance on spatially separate test sets. When conditioned on a subset of species within the same dataset, CISO outperforms alternative methods in predicting the distribution of the remaining species. Furthermore, we show that combining observations from multiple datasets can improve performance. CISO is a promising ecological tool, capable of incorporating incomplete biotic information and identifying potential interactions between species from disparate taxa.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2025.

Builds on

15 of 81 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
  4. 2022On Embeddings for Numerical Features in Tabular Deep Learningcited by 186
  5. 2021Seeing biodiversity: perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservationcited by 130
  6. 2020General Multi-label Image Classification with Transformerscited by 127
  7. 2023Spatial Implicit Neural Representations for Global-Scale Species Mappingcited by 59
  8. 2019A deep active learning system for species identification and counting in camera trap imagescited by 44
  9. 2024GeoPlant: Spatial Plant Species Prediction Datasetcited by 16
  10. 2023Active Learning-Based Species Range Estimationcited by 13
  11. 2024Combining Observational Data and Language for Species Range Estimationcited by 12
  12. 2024On the selection and effectiveness of pseudo-absences for species distribution modeling with deep learningcited by 10
3 more
  1. 2024Animal Behavior Analysis Methods Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 4
  2. 2024Multi-Scale and Multimodal Species Distribution Modelingcited by 3
  3. 2025MaskSDM with Shapley values to improve flexibility, robustness, and explainability in species distribution modelingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.