mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Is a Good Foundation Necessary for Efficient Reinforcement Learning? The Computational Role of the Base Model in Exploration

arXiv 2503.07453 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 36

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Language model alignment (or, reinforcement learning) techniques that leverage active exploration -- deliberately encouraging the model to produce diverse, informative responses -- offer the promise of super-human capabilities. However, current understanding of algorithm design primitives for computationally efficient exploration with language models is limited. To better understand how to leverage access to powerful pre-trained generative models to improve the efficiency of exploration, we introduce a new computational framework for RL with language models, in which the learner interacts with the model through a sampling oracle. Focusing on the linear softmax model parameterization, we provide new results that reveal the computational-statistical tradeoffs of efficient exploration: 1. Necessity of coverage: Coverage refers to the extent to which the pre-trained model covers near-optimal responses -- a form of hidden knowledge. We show that coverage, while not necessary for data efficiency, lower bounds the runtime of any algorithm in our framework. 2. Inference-time exploration: We introduce a new algorithm, SpannerSampling, which obtains optimal data efficiency and is computationally efficient whenever the pre-trained model enjoys sufficient coverage, matching our lower bound. SpannerSampling leverages inference-time computation with the pre-trained model to reduce the effective search space for exploration. 3. Insufficiency of training-time interventions: We contrast the result above by showing that training-time interventions that produce proper policies cannot achieve similar guarantees in polynomial time. 4. Computational benefits of multi-turn exploration: Finally, we show that under additional representational assumptions, one can achieve improved runtime (replacing sequence-level coverage with token-level coverage) through multi-turn exploration.

Key facts. Cited by 36 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 13; 2026: 23.

36 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025Cultivating Pluralism In Algorithmic Monoculture: The Community Alignment Datasetcited by 35
  2. 2025Representation-Based Exploration for Language Models: From Test-Time to Post-Trainingcited by 16
  3. 2025Understanding the Performance Gap in Preference Learning: A Dichotomy of RLHF and DPOcited by 10
  4. 2026On the Power of (Approximate) Reward Models for Inference-Time Scalingcited by 7
  5. 2025On the Limits of Test-Time Compute: Sequential Reward Filtering for Better Inferencecited by 6
  6. 2026Coverage Improvement and Fast Convergence of On-policy Preference Learningcited by 6
  7. 2025Analytical Survey of Learning with Low-Resource Data: From Analysis to Investigationcited by 5
  8. 2026Near-Optimal Regret for KL-Regularized Multi-Armed Banditscited by 5
  9. 2025On the optimization dynamics of RLVR: Gradient gap and step size thresholdscited by 4
  10. 2025Offline and Online KL-Regularized RLHF under Differential Privacycited by 4
  11. 2025Distributional Biases in Post-Training: A Markovian Analysis of Reasoning Trajectoriescited by 4
  12. 2025Provable Benefit of Curriculum in Transformer Tree-Reasoning Post-Trainingcited by 4
24 more
  1. 2026Learning to Reason with Curriculum I: Provable Benefits of Autocurriculumcited by 4
  2. 2026On the Optimal Sample Complexity of Offline Multi-Armed Bandits with KL Regularizationcited by 4
  3. 2025Beyond RLHF: A Unified Theoretical Framework of Alignmentcited by 3
  4. 2026Post-Training with Policy Gradients: Optimality and the Base Model Barriercited by 3
  5. 2026Reject, Resample, Repeat: Understanding Parallel Reasoning in Language Model Inferencecited by 3
  6. 2026Fast Rates for Offline Contextual Bandits with Forward-KL Regularization under Single-Policy Concentrabilitycited by 3
  7. 2026Learning to Reason with Curriculum II: Compositional Generalizationcited by 3
  8. 2026When Does Online Imitation Learning Help in LLM Post-Training? The Role of (Non-)Realizability Beyond Horizoncited by 3
  9. 2025SharedRep-RLHF: A Shared Representation Approach to RLHF with Diverse Preferencescited by 2
  10. 2026TailSFT: Filtered Fine-Tuning Improves Post-Training Performancecited by 2
  11. 2026A Unifying View of Coverage in Linear Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 1
  12. 2026When Is Compositional Reasoning Learnable from Verifiable Rewards?cited by 1
  13. 2026Temper-Then-Tilt: Principled Unlearning for Generative Models through Tempering and Classifier Guidancecited by 1
  14. 2026Breaking the Capability Ceiling of LLM Post-Training by Reintroducing Markov Statescited by 1
  15. 2026Decoupling Exploration and Policy Optimization: Uncertainty Guided Tree Search for Hard Explorationcited by 1
  16. 2026RL Excursions during Pre-Training: Re-examining Policy Optimization for LLM trainingcited by 1
  17. 2026The Power of Test-Time Training for Approximate Samplingcited by 1
  18. 2025Learning to Choose or Choosing to Learn: Best-of-N vs. Supervised Fine-Tuning for Bit String Generationcited by 0
  19. 2025MarkTune: Improving the Quality-Detectability Trade-off in Open-Weight LLM Watermarkingcited by 0
  20. 2026Demystifying Design Choices of Reinforcement Fine-tuning: A Batched Contextual Bandit Learning Perspectivecited by 0
  21. 2026End-to-End Efficient RL for Linear Bellman Complete MDPs with Deterministic Transitionscited by 0
  22. 2026The Role of Generator Access in Autoregressive Post-Trainingcited by 0
  23. 2026How Neural Reward Models Learn Features for Policy Optimization: A Single-Index Analysiscited by 0
  24. 2026Asynchronous LLM Post-Training: Group-Mass Capping and Convergence Analysiscited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Toward Efficient Exploration by Large Language Model Agents
  2. 2026Efficient Exploration at Scale
  3. 2025RAPID: An Efficient Reinforcement Learning Algorithm for Small Language Models
  4. 2024EVOLvE: Evaluating and Optimizing LLMs For In-Context Exploration
  5. 2025Enhancing Efficiency and Exploration in Reinforcement Learning for LLMs
  6. 2026Exploration-Driven Optimization for Test-Time Large Language Model Reasoning
  7. 2025Ignore the KL Penalty! Boosting Exploration on Critical Tokens to Enhance RL Fine-Tuning
  8. 2025Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models with Intrinsic Exploration