Controllable Complementarity: Subjective Preferences in Human-AI Collaboration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Research on human-AI collaboration often prioritizes objective performance. However, understanding human subjective preferences is essential to improving human-AI complementarity and human experiences. We investigate human preferences for controllability in a shared workspace task with AI partners using Behavior Shaping (BS), a reinforcement learning algorithm that allows humans explicit control over AI behavior. In one experiment, we validate the robustness of BS in producing effective AI policies relative to self-play policies, when controls are hidden. In another experiment, we enable human control, showing that participants perceive AI partners as more effective and enjoyable when they can directly dictate AI behavior. Our findings highlight the need to design AI that prioritizes both task performance and subjective human preferences. By aligning AI behavior with human preferences, we demonstrate how human-AI complementarity can extend beyond objective outcomes to include subjective preferences.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2025.
Builds on
14 of 44 references.
References · 14
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,103
- 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 399
- 2019On the Utility of Learning about Humans for Human-AI Coordinationcited by 349
- 2023Reward Design with Language Modelscited by 261
- 2015Contextual Markov Decision Processescited by 220
- 2020"Other-Play" for Zero-Shot Coordinationcited by 198
- 2021Collaborating with Humans without Human Datacited by 142
- 2021Maximum Entropy Population-Based Training for Zero-Shot Human-AI Coordinationcited by 70
- 2023Learning Zero-Shot Cooperation with Humans, Assuming Humans Are Biasedcited by 37
- 2022Any-Play: An Intrinsic Augmentation for Zero-Shot Coordinationcited by 23
- 2022Collective Intelligence in Human-AI Teams: A Bayesian Theory of Mind Approachcited by 16
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Constructive Alignment: Governing Preference Dynamics in Human-AI Interaction
- 2025In Pursuit of Predictive Models of Human Preferences Toward AI Teammates
- 2026Align AI to Dynamic Human-AI Workflows
- 2023Learning Complementary Policies for Human-AI Teams
- 2024Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment
- 2024Social Choice Should Guide AI Alignment in Dealing with Diverse Human Feedback
- 2025A Descriptive and Normative Theory of Human Beliefs in RLHF
- 2024Towards Optimizing Human-Centric Objectives in AI-Assisted Decision-Making With Offline Reinforcement Learning