CLDyB: Towards Dynamic Benchmarking for Continual Learning with Pre-trained Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The advent of the foundation model era has sparked significant research interest in leveraging pre-trained representations for continual learning (CL), yielding a series of top-performing CL methods on standard evaluation benchmarks. Nonetheless, there are growing concerns regarding potential data contamination during the pre-training stage. Furthermore, standard evaluation benchmarks, which are typically static, fail to capture the complexities of real-world CL scenarios, resulting in saturated performance. To address these issues, we describe CL on dynamic benchmarks (CLDyB), a general computational framework based on Markov decision processes for evaluating CL methods reliably. CLDyB dynamically identifies inherently difficult and algorithm-dependent tasks for the given CL methods, and determines challenging task orders using Monte Carlo tree search. Leveraging CLDyB, we first conduct a joint evaluation of multiple state-of-the-art CL methods, leading to a set of commonly challenging and generalizable task sequences where existing CL methods tend to perform poorly. We then conduct separate evaluations of individual CL methods using CLDyB, discovering their respective strengths and weaknesses. The source code and generated task sequences are publicly accessible at https://github.com/szc12153/CLDyB.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 58 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2025.
Builds on
58 of 82 references.
References · 58
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,356
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
- 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,333
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,281
- 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,898
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
- 2017Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replaycited by 1,158
38 more
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,095
- 2018Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEMcited by 1,058
- 2020Dark Experience for General Continual Learning: a Strong, Simple Baselinecited by 911
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and Applicationcited by 872
- 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 797
- 2022DualPrompt: Complementary Prompting for Rehearsal-free Continual Learningcited by 642
- 2019Gradient based sample selection for online continual learningcited by 571
- 2018Learning to Learn without Forgetting by Maximizing Transfer and Minimizing Interferencecited by 521
- 2018Progress & Compress: A scalable framework for continual learningcited by 520
- 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 459
- 2022CODA-Prompt: COntinual Decomposed Attention-based Prompting for Rehearsal-Free Continual Learningcited by 450
- 2023Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Modelscited by 387
- 2019Orthogonal Gradient Descent for Continual Learningcited by 369
- 2021Gradient Projection Memory for Continual Learningcited by 348
- 2017Variational Continual Learningcited by 339
- 2017CORe50: a New Dataset and Benchmark for Continuous Object Recognitioncited by 289
- 2021Co2L: Contrastive Continual Learningcited by 244
- 2023Class-Incremental Learning: A Surveycited by 209
- 2024InfLoRA: Interference-Free Low-Rank Adaptation for Continual Learningcited by 198
- 2023Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheatercited by 194
- 2019Meta-Learning Representations for Continual Learningcited by 189
- 2023Revisiting Class-Incremental Learning with Pre-Trained Models: Generalizability and Adaptivity are All You Needcited by 184
- 2023SLCA: Slow Learner with Classifier Alignment for Continual Learning on a Pre-trained Modelcited by 180
- 2023RanPAC: Random Projections and Pre-trained Models for Continual Learningcited by 164
- 2019Uncertainty-based Continual Learning with Adaptive Regularizationcited by 146
- 2021An Empirical Investigation of the Role of Pre-training in Lifelong Learningcited by 134
- 2023A Unified Continual Learning Framework with General Parameter-Efficient Tuningcited by 125
- 2019Functional Regularisation for Continual Learning with Gaussian Processescited by 123
- 2023Hierarchical Decomposition of Prompt-Based Continual Learning: Rethinking Obscured Sub-optimalitycited by 121
- 2021Online Coreset Selection for Rehearsal-based Continual Learningcited by 117
- 2024Expandable Subspace Ensemble for Pre-Trained Model-Based Class-Incremental Learningcited by 117
- 2022Learning Fast, Learning Slow: A General Continual Learning Method based on Complementary Learning Systemcited by 112
- 2023DyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning Taskscited by 101
- 2022The CLEAR Benchmark: Continual LEArning on Real-World Imagerycited by 93
- 2021Continual Learning in the Teacher-Student Setup: Impact of Task Similaritycited by 88
- 2024Benchmark Self-Evolving: A Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic LLM Evaluationcited by 75
- 2021AFEC: Active Forgetting of Negative Transfer in Continual Learningcited by 73
- 2022Continual Learning with Foundation Models: An Empirical Study of Latent Replaycited by 61
50 most cited of 58 All 58 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.