Training neural networks faster with minimal tuning using pre-computed lists of hyperparameters for NAdamW
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
If we want to train a neural network using any of the most popular optimization algorithms, we are immediately faced with a dilemma: how to set the various optimization and regularization hyperparameters? When computational resources are abundant, there are a variety of methods for finding good hyperparameter settings, but when resources are limited the only realistic choices are using standard default values of uncertain quality and provenance, or tuning only a couple of the most important hyperparameters via extremely limited handdesigned sweeps. Extending the idea of default settings to a modest tuning budget, Metz et al. (2020) proposed using ordered lists of well-performing hyperparameter settings, derived from a broad hyperparameter search on a large library of training workloads. However, to date, no practical and performant hyperparameter lists that generalize to representative deep learning workloads have been demonstrated. In this paper, we present hyperparameter lists for NAdamW derived from extensive experiments on the realistic workloads in the AlgoPerf: Training Algorithms benchmark. Our hyperparameter lists also include values for basic regularization techniques (i.e. weight decay, label smoothing, and dropout). In particular, our best NAdamW hyperparameter list performs well on AlgoPerf held-out workloads not used to construct it, and represents a compelling turn-key approach to tuning when restricted to five or fewer trials. It also outperforms basic learning rate/weight decay sweeps and an off-the-shelf Bayesian optimization tool when restricted to the same budget.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2025.
Builds on
11 of 29 references.
References · 11
- 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 699
- 2018BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scalecited by 470
- 2015Non-stochastic Best Arm Identification and Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 221
- 2019DeepOBS: A Deep Learning Optimizer Benchmark Suitecited by 37
- 2020Using a thousand optimization tasks to learn hyperparameter search strategiescited by 29
- 2022Benchopt: Reproducible, efficient and collaborative optimization benchmarkscited by 27
- 2017Pitfalls and Best Practices in Algorithm Configurationcited by 25
- 2017Hyperparameter Optimization: A Spectral Approachcited by 24
- 2021Training Learned Optimizers with Randomly Initialized Learned Optimizerscited by 13
- 2017Critical Hyper-Parameters: No Random, No Crycited by 8
- 2023Show Your Work with Confidence: Confidence Bands for Tuning Curvescited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Muon Does Not Converge on Convex Lipschitz Functionscited by 9
- 2026Muon Does Not Converge on Convex Lipschitz Functions9 May 2026