mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hyperparameter Optimization: A Spectral Approach

arXiv 1706.00764 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2017cs.LG cs.AI math.OCcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We give a simple, fast algorithm for hyperparameter optimization inspired by techniques from the analysis of Boolean functions. We focus on the high-dimensional regime where the canonical example is training a neural network with a large number of hyperparameters. The algorithm --- an iterative application of compressed sensing techniques for orthogonal polynomials --- requires only uniform sampling of the hyperparameters and is thus easily parallelizable. Experiments for training deep neural networks on Cifar-10 show that compared to state-of-the-art tools (e.g., Hyperband and Spearmint), our algorithm finds significantly improved solutions, in some cases better than what is attainable by hand-tuning. In terms of overall running time (i.e., time required to sample various settings of hyperparameters plus additional computation time), we are at least an order of magnitude faster than Hyperband and Bayesian Optimization. We also outperform Random Search 8x. Additionally, our method comes with provable guarantees and yields the first improvements on the sample complexity of learning decision trees in over two decades. In particular, we obtain the first quasi-polynomial time algorithm for learning noisy decision trees with polynomial sample complexity.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 7; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Properly learning decision trees in almost polynomial timecited by 20
  2. 2021Highlighting the Importance of Reducing Research Bias and Carbon Emissions in CNNscited by 9
  3. 2022Superpolynomial Lower Bounds for Decision Tree Learning and Testingcited by 9
  4. 2022Adaptive Gradient Methods with Local Guaranteescited by 8
  5. 2021Decision tree heuristics can fail, even in the smoothed settingcited by 7
  6. 2022Global Optimization with Parametric Function Approximationcited by 7
  7. 2022Trade-off Between Efficiency and Consistency for Removal-based Explanationscited by 6
  8. 2023A Nonstochastic Control Approach to Optimizationcited by 4
  9. 2022Popular decision tree algorithms are provably noise tolerantcited by 3
  10. 2023Machine learning for sports betting: should model selection be based on accuracy or calibration?cited by 2
  11. 2024Superconstant Inapproximability of Decision Tree Learningcited by 2
  12. 2026Provably Data-driven Multiple Hyper-parameter Tuning with Structured Loss Functioncited by 2
12 more
  1. 2021Convolution Neural Network Hyperparameter Optimization Using Simplified Swarm Optimizationcited by 1
  2. 2021Learning stochastic decision treescited by 1
  3. 2023Communication-Efficient Federated Non-Linear Bandit Optimizationcited by 1
  4. 2021A hyperparameter-tuning approach to automated inverse planningcited by 0
  5. 2022Neighbor Regularized Bayesian Optimization for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 0
  6. 2022Early Diagnosis of Retinal Blood Vessel Damage via Deep Learning-Powered Collective Intelligence Modelscited by 0
  7. 2023ALT: An Automatic System for Long Tail Scenario Modelingcited by 0
  8. 2024Beyond Trend Following: Deep Learning for Market Trend Predictioncited by 0
  9. 2024Privacy-Computation trade-offs in Private Repetition and Metaselectioncited by 0
  10. 2025Training neural networks faster with minimal tuning using pre-computed lists of hyperparameters for NAdamWcited by 0
  11. 2025T-TAMER: Provably Taming Trade-offs in ML Servingcited by 0
  12. 2026Which Hyperparameters Matter? A Game-Theoretic Framework for Interpretable Hyperparameter Sensitivity Analysiscited by 0