Hyperparameter Optimization: A Spectral Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We give a simple, fast algorithm for hyperparameter optimization inspired by techniques from the analysis of Boolean functions. We focus on the high-dimensional regime where the canonical example is training a neural network with a large number of hyperparameters. The algorithm --- an iterative application of compressed sensing techniques for orthogonal polynomials --- requires only uniform sampling of the hyperparameters and is thus easily parallelizable. Experiments for training deep neural networks on Cifar-10 show that compared to state-of-the-art tools (e.g., Hyperband and Spearmint), our algorithm finds significantly improved solutions, in some cases better than what is attainable by hand-tuning. In terms of overall running time (i.e., time required to sample various settings of hyperparameters plus additional computation time), we are at least an order of magnitude faster than Hyperband and Bayesian Optimization. We also outperform Random Search 8x. Additionally, our method comes with provable guarantees and yields the first improvements on the sample complexity of learning decision trees in over two decades. In particular, we obtain the first quasi-polynomial time algorithm for learning noisy decision trees with polynomial sample complexity.
Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 7; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
24 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2021Properly learning decision trees in almost polynomial timecited by 20
- 2021Highlighting the Importance of Reducing Research Bias and Carbon Emissions in CNNscited by 9
- 2022Superpolynomial Lower Bounds for Decision Tree Learning and Testingcited by 9
- 2022Adaptive Gradient Methods with Local Guaranteescited by 8
- 2021Decision tree heuristics can fail, even in the smoothed settingcited by 7
- 2022Global Optimization with Parametric Function Approximationcited by 7
- 2022Trade-off Between Efficiency and Consistency for Removal-based Explanationscited by 6
- 2023A Nonstochastic Control Approach to Optimizationcited by 4
- 2022Popular decision tree algorithms are provably noise tolerantcited by 3
- 2023Machine learning for sports betting: should model selection be based on accuracy or calibration?cited by 2
- 2024Superconstant Inapproximability of Decision Tree Learningcited by 2
- 2026Provably Data-driven Multiple Hyper-parameter Tuning with Structured Loss Functioncited by 2
12 more
- 2021Convolution Neural Network Hyperparameter Optimization Using Simplified Swarm Optimizationcited by 1
- 2021Learning stochastic decision treescited by 1
- 2023Communication-Efficient Federated Non-Linear Bandit Optimizationcited by 1
- 2021A hyperparameter-tuning approach to automated inverse planningcited by 0
- 2022Neighbor Regularized Bayesian Optimization for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 0
- 2022Early Diagnosis of Retinal Blood Vessel Damage via Deep Learning-Powered Collective Intelligence Modelscited by 0
- 2023ALT: An Automatic System for Long Tail Scenario Modelingcited by 0
- 2024Beyond Trend Following: Deep Learning for Market Trend Predictioncited by 0
- 2024Privacy-Computation trade-offs in Private Repetition and Metaselectioncited by 0
- 2025Training neural networks faster with minimal tuning using pre-computed lists of hyperparameters for NAdamWcited by 0
- 2025T-TAMER: Provably Taming Trade-offs in ML Servingcited by 0
- 2026Which Hyperparameters Matter? A Game-Theoretic Framework for Interpretable Hyperparameter Sensitivity Analysiscited by 0
- 2026Which Hyperparameters Matter? A Game-Theoretic Framework for Interpretable Hyperparameter Sensitivity Analysis17 Jul 2026
- 2026Provably Data-driven Multiple Hyper-parameter Tuning with Structured Loss Function2 Feb 2026
- 2025T-TAMER: Provably Taming Trade-offs in ML Serving26 Sep 2025
- 2025Training neural networks faster with minimal tuning using pre-computed lists of hyperparameters for NAdamW6 Mar 2025
- 2024Privacy-Computation trade-offs in Private Repetition and Metaselection22 Oct 2024
- 2024Superconstant Inapproximability of Decision Tree Learning1 Jul 2024
- 2024Beyond Trend Following: Deep Learning for Market Trend Prediction10 Jun 2024
- 2023Communication-Efficient Federated Non-Linear Bandit Optimization3 Nov 2023
- 2023ALT: An Automatic System for Long Tail Scenario Modeling19 May 2023
- 2023Machine learning for sports betting: should model selection be based on accuracy or calibration?10 Mar 2023
- 2023A Nonstochastic Control Approach to Optimization19 Jan 2023
- 2022Global Optimization with Parametric Function Approximation16 Nov 2022
12 more
- 2022Trade-off Between Efficiency and Consistency for Removal-based Explanations31 Oct 2022
- 2022Early Diagnosis of Retinal Blood Vessel Damage via Deep Learning-Powered Collective Intelligence Models17 Oct 2022
- 2022Superpolynomial Lower Bounds for Decision Tree Learning and Testing12 Oct 2022
- 2022Neighbor Regularized Bayesian Optimization for Hyperparameter Optimization7 Oct 2022
- 2022Popular decision tree algorithms are provably noise tolerant17 Jun 2022
- 2022Adaptive Gradient Methods with Local Guarantees2 Mar 2022
- 2021Properly learning decision trees in almost polynomial time1 Sep 2021
- 2021Decision tree heuristics can fail, even in the smoothed setting2 Jul 2021
- 2021Highlighting the Importance of Reducing Research Bias and Carbon Emissions in CNNs6 Jun 2021
- 2021A hyperparameter-tuning approach to automated inverse planning14 May 2021
- 2021Learning stochastic decision trees8 May 2021
- 2021Convolution Neural Network Hyperparameter Optimization Using Simplified Swarm Optimization6 Mar 2021
- 2025T-TAMER: Provably Taming Trade-offs in ML Servingcited by 0
- 2025T-TAMER: Provably Taming Trade-offs in ML Serving26 Sep 2025
- 2021Properly learning decision trees in almost polynomial timecited by 20
- 2021Highlighting the Importance of Reducing Research Bias and Carbon Emissions in CNNscited by 9
- 2022Superpolynomial Lower Bounds for Decision Tree Learning and Testingcited by 9
- 2022Adaptive Gradient Methods with Local Guaranteescited by 8
- 2021Decision tree heuristics can fail, even in the smoothed settingcited by 7
- 2022Global Optimization with Parametric Function Approximationcited by 7
- 2022Trade-off Between Efficiency and Consistency for Removal-based Explanationscited by 6
- 2023A Nonstochastic Control Approach to Optimizationcited by 4
- 2022Popular decision tree algorithms are provably noise tolerantcited by 3
- 2023Machine learning for sports betting: should model selection be based on accuracy or calibration?cited by 2
- 2024Superconstant Inapproximability of Decision Tree Learningcited by 2
- 2026Provably Data-driven Multiple Hyper-parameter Tuning with Structured Loss Functioncited by 2
12 most cited of 23 All 23 (JSON)
- 2026Which Hyperparameters Matter? A Game-Theoretic Framework for Interpretable Hyperparameter Sensitivity Analysis17 Jul 2026
- 2026Provably Data-driven Multiple Hyper-parameter Tuning with Structured Loss Function2 Feb 2026
- 2025Training neural networks faster with minimal tuning using pre-computed lists of hyperparameters for NAdamW6 Mar 2025
- 2024Privacy-Computation trade-offs in Private Repetition and Metaselection22 Oct 2024
- 2024Superconstant Inapproximability of Decision Tree Learning1 Jul 2024
- 2024Beyond Trend Following: Deep Learning for Market Trend Prediction10 Jun 2024
- 2023Communication-Efficient Federated Non-Linear Bandit Optimization3 Nov 2023
- 2023ALT: An Automatic System for Long Tail Scenario Modeling19 May 2023
- 2023Machine learning for sports betting: should model selection be based on accuracy or calibration?10 Mar 2023
- 2023A Nonstochastic Control Approach to Optimization19 Jan 2023
- 2022Global Optimization with Parametric Function Approximation16 Nov 2022
- 2022Trade-off Between Efficiency and Consistency for Removal-based Explanations31 Oct 2022
12 newest of 23 All 23 (JSON)