Effectively Steer LLM To Follow Preference via Building Confident Directions
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Having an LLM that aligns with human preferences is essential for accommodating individual needs, such as maintaining writing style or generating specific topics of interest. The majority of current alignment methods rely on fine-tuning or prompting, which can be either costly or difficult to control. Model steering algorithms, which modify the model output by constructing specific steering directions, are typically easy to implement and optimization-free. However, their capabilities are typically limited to steering the model into one of the two directions (i.e., bidirectional steering), and there has been no theoretical understanding to guarantee their performance. In this work, we propose a theoretical framework to understand and quantify the model steering methods. Inspired by the framework, we propose a confident direction steering method (CONFST) that steers LLMs via modifying their activations at inference time. More specifically, CONFST builds a confident direction that is closely aligned with users' preferences, and this direction is then added to the activations of the LLMs to effectively steer the model output. Our approach offers three key advantages over popular bidirectional model steering methods: 1) It is more powerful, since multiple (i.e. more than two) users' preferences can be aligned simultaneously; 2) It is simple to implement, since there is no need to determine which layer to add the steering vector to; 3) No explicit user instruction is required. We validate our method on GPT-2 XL (1.5B), Mistral (7B) and Gemma-it (9B) models for tasks that require shifting the output of LLMs across various topics and styles, achieving superior performance over competing methods.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 36 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2025.
Builds on
36 of 48 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Is Free Self-Alignment Possible?5 Jun
- 2023The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learning4 Dec
- 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment14 Apr
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
Other references · 32
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,434
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
20 more
- 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 1,001
- 2021An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inferencecited by 938
- 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 748
- 2023Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHFcited by 712
- 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 686
- 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 437
- 2023RLHF-V: Towards Trustworthy MLLMs via Behavior Alignment from Fine-grained Correctional Human Feedbackcited by 412
- 2023In-context Vectors: Making In Context Learning More Effective and Controllable Through Latent Space Steeringcited by 245
- 2022Extracting Latent Steering Vectors from Pretrained Language Modelscited by 225
- 2024Programming Refusal with Conditional Activation Steeringcited by 206
- 2023ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of nonecited by 204
- 2023Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 194
- 2023Large Language Models Are Latent Variable Models: Explaining and Finding Good Demonstrations for In-Context Learningcited by 149
- 2023HelpSteer: Multi-attribute Helpfulness Dataset for SteerLMcited by 142
- 2024Adaptive Activation Steering: A Tuning-Free LLM Truthfulness Improvement Method for Diverse Hallucinations Categoriescited by 77
- 2024Aligning LLM Agents by Learning Latent Preference from User Editscited by 69
- 2024Style Vectors for Steering Generative Large Language Modelcited by 56
- 2024Personalized Large Language Modelscited by 44
- 2024Truthful Aggregation of LLMs with an Application to Online Advertisingcited by 29
- 2024Discovering Bias in Latent Space: An Unsupervised Debiasing Approachcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2025Mitigating Overthinking in Large Reasoning Models via Manifold Steeringcited by 33
- 2025Beyond Linear Steering: Unified Multi-Attribute Control for Language Modelscited by 25
- 2025Arch-Router: Aligning LLM Routing with Human Preferencescited by 9
- 2026ORBIT: Training-Free Multi-Attribute Behavioral Steering via Orthogonal Subspace Rotationcited by 4
- 2025From Word to World: Evaluate and Mitigate Culture Bias in LLMs via Word Association Testcited by 2
- 2025Let's Get You Hired: A Job Seeker's Perspective on Multi-Agent Recruitment Systems for Explaining Hiring Decisionscited by 2
- 2025Concept Attractors in LLMs and their Applicationscited by 1
- 2026ORBIT: Training-Free Multi-Attribute Behavioral Steering via Orthogonal Subspace Rotation21 Jun 2026
- 2025Concept Attractors in LLMs and their Applications30 Dec 2025
- 2025Arch-Router: Aligning LLM Routing with Human Preferences19 Jun 2025
- 2025Beyond Linear Steering: Unified Multi-Attribute Control for Language Models30 May 2025
- 2025Mitigating Overthinking in Large Reasoning Models via Manifold Steering28 May 2025
- 2025From Word to World: Evaluate and Mitigate Culture Bias in LLMs via Word Association Test24 May 2025
- 2025Let's Get You Hired: A Job Seeker's Perspective on Multi-Agent Recruitment Systems for Explaining Hiring Decisions22 May 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Personalized Steering of Large Language Models: Versatile Steering Vectors Through Bi-directional Preference Optimization
- 2026Does Steering Break Your Model? A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Suite for LLM Steering Methods
- 2026Where to Steer: Input-Dependent Layer Selection for Steering Improves LLM Alignment
- 2025SteerX: Disentangled Steering for LLM Personalization
- 2026When Is Rank-1 Steering Cheap? Geometry, Granularity, and Budgeted Search
- 2025Self-Improving Model Steering
- 2024Few-shot Steerable Alignment: Adapting Rewards and LLM Policies with Neural Processes
- 2025Improved Representation Steering for Language Models