Traceable, Enforceable, and Compensable Participation: A Participation Ledger for People-Centered AI Governance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Participatory approaches are widely invoked in AI governance, yet participation rarely translates into durable influence. In public sector and civic AI systems, community contributions such as deliberations, annotations, prompts, and incident reports are often recorded informally, weakly linked to system updates, and disconnected from enforceable rights or sustained compensation. As a result, participation is frequently symbolic rather than accountable. We introduce the Participation Ledger, a machine readable and auditable framework that operationalizes participation as traceable influence, enforceable authority, and compensable labor. The ledger represents participation as an influence graph that links contributed artifacts to verified changes in AI systems, including datasets, prompts, adapters, policies, guardrails, and evaluation suites. It integrates three elements: a Participation Evidence Standard documenting consent, privacy, compensation, and reuse terms; an influence tracing mechanism that connects system updates to replayable before and after tests, enabling longitudinal monitoring of commitments; and encoded rights and incentives. Capability Vouchers allow authorized community stewards to request or constrain specific system capabilities within defined boundaries, while Participation Credits support ongoing recognition and compensation when contributed tests continue to provide value. We ground the framework in four urban AI and public space governance deployments and provide a machine readable schema, templates, and an evaluation plan for assessing traceability, enforceability, and compensation in practice.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2026.
Builds on
9 of 39 references.
References · 9
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
- 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
- 2024A Roadmap to Pluralistic Alignmentcited by 175
- 2022Power to the People? Opportunities and Challenges for Participatory AIcited by 137
- 2020Participation is not a Design Fix for Machine Learningcited by 110
- 2025LIVS: A Pluralistic Alignment Dataset for Inclusive Public Spacescited by 8
- 2025Street Review: A Participatory AI-Based Framework for Assessing Streetscape Inclusivitycited by 3
- 2025WeDesign: Generative AI-Facilitated Community Consultations for Urban Public Space Designcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.