Feature Superposition in Neural Networks: From Theory to Practice
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Superposition refers to neural networks representing more features than they have dimensions. It offers a possible explanation for polysemantic neurons and motivates methods for recovering interpretable features from neural activations. Theoretical models typically start with a given set of input features and assumptions about how their values vary across inputs, then study how a network encodes those values in a lower-dimensional hidden representation. Empirical work, by contrast, seeks to identify the features encoded in trained networks and determine their role in computation. In this survey, we review the geometry, learning, and computation of superposed representations, explaining how feature statistics and decoder choice affect the conclusions. To connect these theoretical accounts with evidence from trained networks, we compare practical methods for recovering and analyzing features and examine what their evaluations establish. Since accurate activation reconstruction alone does not establish feature identity or causal use, we discuss the methods' documented failures and applications in light of the evidence available for these different claims. Finally, we assess previously stated open problems and identify remaining theoretical and empirical questions about superposition in trained networks. We hope our work can pave the way for a deeper understanding of superposition and more reliable methods for interpreting neural networks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 25 of its 92 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2026.
Builds on
25 of 92 references.
Closest ancestors · 9
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Sparse probes and murky physics: a case study of interpretability challenges in a foundation model for continuum dynamics10 Jun
- 2026From Data Statistics to Feature Geometry: How Correlations Shape Superposition10 Mar
- 2026SynthSAEBench: Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders on Scalable Realistic Synthetic Data16 Feb
- 2025Superposition as Lossy Compression: Measure with Sparse Autoencoders and Connect to Adversarial Vulnerability15 Dec
- 2025Sparse but Wrong: Incorrect L0 Leads to Incorrect Features in Sparse Autoencoders22 Aug
- 2025Superposition Yields Robust Neural Scaling15 May
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Do Not Find Canonical Units of Analysis7 Feb
- 2024Decomposing The Dark Matter of Sparse Autoencoders18 Oct
- 2024Towards Principled Evaluations of Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretability and Control14 May
Other references · 16
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
- 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 435
- 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 422
- 2025AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoderscited by 218
- 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 212
- 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 200
- 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoderscited by 179
- 2025Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 179
- 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 160
- 2022Toward Transparent AI: A Survey on Interpreting the Inner Structures of Deep Neural Networkscited by 129
- 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretabilitycited by 124
4 more
- 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probingcited by 115
- 2025Adversarial Attacks Leverage Interference Between Features in Superpositioncited by 8
- 2025Expand Neurons, Not Parameterscited by 3
- 2025Superposition in Graph Neural Networkscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025From superposition to sparse codes: interpretable representations in neural networks
- 2026Effects of sparsity and superposition on loss in simple autoencoders
- 2026Compressed Computation under L4 Loss is likely Computation in Superposition
- 2024Mathematical Models of Computation in Superposition
- 2025Superposition disentanglement of neural representations reveals hidden alignment
- 2023Identifying Interpretable Visual Features in Artificial and Biological Neural Systems
- 2024On the Complexity of Neural Computation in Superposition
- 2024Superposition through Active Learning lens