PEO: Improving Bi-Factorial Preference Alignment with Post-Training Policy Extrapolation
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
The alignment of large language models with human values presents a critical challenge, particularly when balancing conflicting objectives like helpfulness and harmlessness. Existing approaches, such as Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), face notable limitations: RLHF suffers from instability and inefficiency in multi-objective optimization, while DPO lacks mechanisms for dynamic trade-offs. To address these challenges, we propose Post-Training Extrapolation Optimization (PEO), a novel and efficient framework for bi-factorial alignment. PEO generates a family of Pareto-optimal policies in a single training pass by leveraging a three-phase pipeline: (1) aspect-specific learning, (2) generalist initialization via interpolation, and (3) post-training optimization via extrapolation. PEO enables dynamic adaptation to diverse user preferences at inference time without retraining. Our comprehensive experiments across multiple LLMs demonstrate that PEO achieves superior Pareto fronts compared to baselines, offering improved flexibility and computational efficiency. Theoretical analyses further highlight PEO's capacity to overcome optimization bottlenecks, paving the way for scalable, personalized alignment.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 33 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2025.
Builds on
33 of 52 references.
Closest ancestors · 10
Same direction, newest first
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
- 2024Model Extrapolation Expedites Alignment25 Apr
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
- 2024Provably Robust DPO: Aligning Language Models with Noisy Feedback1 Mar
- 2024Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewards28 Feb
- 2024Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positive20 Feb
- 2024Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustment15 Feb
- 2023Chat Vector: A Simple Approach to Equip LLMs with Instruction Following and Model Alignment in New Languages7 Oct
- 2023Beyond One-Preference-Fits-All Alignment: Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimization5 Oct
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
Other references · 23
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,116
- 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 828
- 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 630
- 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 626
- 2023Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modelingcited by 486
11 more
- 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 445
- 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 369
- 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Mergingcited by 271
- 2021A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planningcited by 240
- 2023Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPOcited by 226
- 2023Reward Model Ensembles Help Mitigate Overoptimizationcited by 225
- 2023Helping or Herding? Reward Model Ensembles Mitigate but do not Eliminate Reward Hackingcited by 195
- 2019Deep Reinforcement Learning from Policy-Dependent Human Feedbackcited by 56
- 2024The N+ Implementation Details of RLHF with PPO: A Case Study on TL;DR Summarizationcited by 49
- 2024HD-Eval: Aligning Large Language Model Evaluators Through Hierarchical Criteria Decompositioncited by 33
- 2024MAP: Multi-Human-Value Alignment Palettecited by 20
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Gradient-Adaptive Policy Optimization: Towards Multi-Objective Alignment of Large Language Models
- 2026Meta-Aligner: Bidirectional Preference-Policy Optimization for Multi-Objective LLMs Alignment
- 2024Towards Efficient Exact Optimization of Language Model Alignment
- 2025MPO: An Efficient Post-Processing Framework for Mixing Diverse Preference Alignment
- 2024Linear Alignment: A Closed-form Solution for Aligning Human Preferences without Tuning and Feedback
- 2024SPO: Multi-Dimensional Preference Sequential Alignment With Implicit Reward Modeling
- 2024Unified Preference Optimization: Language Model Alignment Beyond the Preference Frontier
- 2025UC-MOA: Utility-Conditioned Multi-Objective Alignment for Distributional Pareto-Optimality