mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Synergy Between Sufficient Changes and Sparse Mixing Procedure for Disentangled Representation Learning

arXiv 2503.00639 ↗First posted 1 Mar 2025cs.LG stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Disentangled representation learning aims to uncover latent variables underlying the observed data, and generally speaking, rather strong assumptions are needed to ensure identifiability. Some approaches rely on sufficient changes on the distribution of latent variables indicated by auxiliary variables such as domain indices, but acquiring enough domains is often challenging. Alternative approaches exploit structural sparsity assumptions on the mixing procedure, but such constraints are usually (partially) violated in practice. Interestingly, we find that these two seemingly unrelated assumptions can actually complement each other to achieve identifiability. Specifically, when conditioned on auxiliary variables, the sparse mixing procedure assumption provides structural constraints on the mapping from estimated to true latent variables and hence compensates for potentially insufficient distribution changes. Building on this insight, we propose an identifiability theory with less restrictive constraints regarding distribution changes and the sparse mixing procedure, enhancing applicability to real-world scenarios. Additionally, we develop an estimation framework incorporating a domain encoding network and a sparse mixing constraint and provide two implementations based on variational autoencoders and generative adversarial networks, respectively. Experiment results on synthetic and real-world datasets support our theoretical results.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2025.

Builds on

55 of 80 references.

References · 55

  1. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  2. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
  3. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  4. 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,609
  5. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  6. 2020Training Generative Adversarial Networks with Limited Datacited by 1,184
  7. 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 929
  8. 2018Self-Attention Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 809
  9. 2018Disentangling by Factorisingcited by 614
  10. 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 590
  11. 2016Conditional Image Synthesis With Auxiliary Classifier GANscited by 562
  12. 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 494
38 more
  1. 2018Towards a Definition of Disentangled Representationscited by 294
  2. 2018Nonlinear ICA Using Auxiliary Variables and Generalized Contrastive Learningcited by 278
  3. 2016Unsupervised Feature Extraction by Time-Contrastive Learning and Nonlinear ICAcited by 270
  4. 2018cGANs with Projection Discriminatorcited by 253
  5. 2017Variational Inference of Disentangled Latent Concepts from Unlabeled Observationscited by 240
  6. 2020Weakly-Supervised Disentanglement Without Compromisescited by 237
  7. 2019Few-Shot Unsupervised Image-to-Image Translationcited by 222
  8. 2016Coupled Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 216
  9. 2018Neural Autoregressive Flowscited by 207
  10. 2021Disentanglement via Mechanism Sparsity Regularization: A New Principle for Nonlinear ICAcited by 158
  11. 2020Towards Nonlinear Disentanglement in Natural Data with Temporal Sparse Codingcited by 121
  12. 2022Disentangled Representation Learningcited by 111
  13. 2020ICE-BeeM: Identifiable Conditional Energy-Based Deep Models Based on Nonlinear ICAcited by 102
  14. 2017Multi-Level Variational Autoencoder: Learning Disentangled Representations from Grouped Observationscited by 100
  15. 2021Independent mechanism analysis, a new concept?cited by 96
  16. 2021Learning Temporally Causal Latent Processes from General Temporal Datacited by 96
  17. 2020On Disentangled Representations Learned From Correlated Datacited by 94
  18. 2022On the Identifiability of Nonlinear ICA: Sparsity and Beyondcited by 84
  19. 2020Hidden Markov Nonlinear ICA: Unsupervised Learning from Nonstationary Time Seriescited by 76
  20. 2024Causal Representation Learning from Multiple Distributions: A General Settingcited by 67
  21. 2021Disentangling Identifiable Features from Noisy Data with Structured Nonlinear ICAcited by 64
  22. 2018Structured Disentangled Representationscited by 62
  23. 2022Temporally Disentangled Representation Learningcited by 59
  24. 2023Identifiability of latent-variable and structural-equation models: from linear to nonlinearcited by 58
  25. 2019Disentangling Factors of Variation Using Few Labelscited by 57
  26. 2021Rebooting ACGAN: Auxiliary Classifier GANs with Stable Trainingcited by 57
  27. 2020Learning Disentangled Semantic Representation for Domain Adaptationcited by 54
  28. 2021Identifiable Deep Generative Models via Sparse Decodingcited by 54
  29. 2022Function Classes for Identifiable Nonlinear Independent Component Analysiscited by 53
  30. 2020A Sober Look at the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representations and their Evaluationcited by 52
  31. 2023Nonlinear Independent Component Analysis for Principled Disentanglement in Unsupervised Deep Learningcited by 48
  32. 2024Nonparametric Partial Disentanglement via Mechanism Sparsity: Sparse Actions, Interventions and Sparse Temporal Dependenciescited by 39
  33. 2023Subspace Identification for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 36
  34. 2023Generalizing Nonlinear ICA Beyond Structural Sparsitycited by 33
  35. 2023Leveraging sparse and shared feature activations for disentangled representation learningcited by 32
  36. 2023Causal Representation Learning Made Identifiable by Grouping of Observational Variablescited by 30
  37. 2023Explicitly Minimizing the Blur Error of Variational Autoencoderscited by 29
  38. 2022Collapse by Conditioning: Training Class-conditional GANs with Limited Datacited by 24

50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.