mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AuthSim: Towards Authentic and Effective Safety-critical Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Tests

arXiv 2502.21100 ↗First posted 28 Feb 2025cs.RO cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Adversarial scenarios and safety testing

Abstract (arXiv)

Generating adversarial safety-critical scenarios is a pivotal method for testing autonomous driving systems, as it identifies potential weaknesses and enhances system robustness and reliability. However, existing approaches predominantly emphasize unrestricted collision scenarios, prompting non-player character (NPC) vehicles to attack the ego vehicle indiscriminately. These works overlook these scenarios' authenticity, rationality, and relevance, resulting in numerous extreme, contrived, and largely unrealistic collision events involving aggressive NPC vehicles. To rectify this issue, we propose a three-layer relative safety region model, which partitions the area based on danger levels and increases the likelihood of NPC vehicles entering relative boundary regions. This model directs NPC vehicles to engage in adversarial actions within relatively safe boundary regions, thereby augmenting the scenarios' authenticity. We introduce AuthSim, a comprehensive platform for generating authentic and effective safety-critical scenarios by integrating the three-layer relative safety region model with reinforcement learning. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to address the authenticity and effectiveness of autonomous driving system test scenarios comprehensively. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AuthSim outperforms existing methods in generating effective safety-critical scenarios. Notably, AuthSim achieves a 5.25% improvement in average cut-in distance and a 27.12% enhancement in average collision interval time, while maintaining higher efficiency in generating effective safety-critical scenarios compared to existing methods. This underscores its significant advantage in producing authentic scenarios over current methodologies.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Adversarial scenarios and safety testing, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 20 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2025.

Builds on

20 of 47 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2021Generating Useful Accident-Prone Driving Scenarios via a Learned Traffic Prior9 Dec

Other references · 19

  1. 2019A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologiescited by 373
  2. 2021TrafficSim: Learning to Simulate Realistic Multi-Agent Behaviorscited by 192
  3. 2021AdvSim: Generating Safety-Critical Scenarios for Self-Driving Vehiclescited by 132
  4. 2017On a Formal Model of Safe and Scalable Self-driving Carscited by 129
  5. 2020LGSVL Simulator: A High Fidelity Simulator for Autonomous Drivingcited by 119
  6. 2020Interpretable End-to-end Urban Autonomous Driving with Latent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 99
  7. 2021GeoSim: Realistic Video Simulation via Geometry-Aware Composition for Self-Drivingcited by 75
  8. 2020Learning to Collide: An Adaptive Safety-Critical Scenarios Generating Methodcited by 74
  9. 2021ROAD: The ROad event Awareness Dataset for Autonomous Drivingcited by 54
  10. 2021On Exposing the Challenging Long Tail in Future Prediction of Traffic Actorscited by 48
  11. 2020Adversarial Evaluation of Autonomous Vehicles in Lane-Change Scenarioscited by 42
  12. 2020Formal Scenario-Based Testing of Autonomous Vehicles: From Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 38
7 more
  1. 2021CausalCity: Complex Simulations with Agency for Causal Discovery and Reasoningcited by 23
  2. 2019CMTS: Conditional Multiple Trajectory Synthesizer for Generating Safety-critical Driving Scenarioscited by 19
  3. 2017Towards Full Automated Drive in Urban Environments: A Demonstration in GoMentum Station, Californiacited by 17
  4. 2019Mcity Data Collection for Automated Vehicles Studycited by 7
  5. 2021Finding Failures in High-Fidelity Simulation using Adaptive Stress Testing and the Backward Algorithmcited by 7
  6. 2021Single and Multi-objective Test Cases Prioritization for Self-driving Cars in Virtual Environmentscited by 6
  7. 2023Boundary State Generation for Testing and Improvement of Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Learning Responsibility-Attributed Adversarial Scenarios for Testing Autonomous Vehicles
  2. 2025From Words to Collisions: LLM-Guided Evaluation and Adversarial Generation of Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios
  3. 2026SaFeR: Safety-Critical Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving Test via Feasibility-Constrained Token Resampling
  4. 2024SEAL: Towards Safe Autonomous Driving via Skill-Enabled Adversary Learning for Closed-Loop Scenario Generation
  5. 2025Towards Benchmarking and Assessing the Safety and Robustness of Autonomous Driving on Safety-critical Scenarios
  6. 2026Safety-Critical Scenarios Emerge from Initial Scenes ↗
  7. 2025Adversarial Generation and Collaborative Evolution of Safety-Critical Scenarios for Autonomous Vehicles
  8. 2026From Attacks to Curricula: Learnability-Guided Adversarial Training for Safe Autonomous Driving