mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Finding Failures in High-Fidelity Simulation using Adaptive Stress Testing and the Backward Algorithm

arXiv 2107.12940 ↗First posted 27 Jul 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Validating the safety of autonomous systems generally requires the use of high-fidelity simulators that adequately capture the variability of real-world scenarios. However, it is generally not feasible to exhaustively search the space of simulation scenarios for failures. Adaptive stress testing (AST) is a method that uses reinforcement learning to find the most likely failure of a system. AST with a deep reinforcement learning solver has been shown to be effective in finding failures across a range of different systems. This approach generally involves running many simulations, which can be very expensive when using a high-fidelity simulator. To improve efficiency, we present a method that first finds failures in a low-fidelity simulator. It then uses the backward algorithm, which trains a deep neural network policy using a single expert demonstration, to adapt the low-fidelity failures to high-fidelity. We have created a series of autonomous vehicle validation case studies that represent some of the ways low-fidelity and high-fidelity simulators can differ, such as time discretization. We demonstrate in a variety of case studies that this new AST approach is able to find failures with significantly fewer high-fidelity simulation steps than are needed when just running AST directly in high-fidelity. As a proof of concept, we also demonstrate AST on NVIDIA's DriveSim simulator, an industry state-of-the-art high-fidelity simulator for finding failures in autonomous vehicles.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2021.

Builds on

13 of 21 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  3. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  4. 2018Learning Montezuma's Revenge from a Single Demonstrationcited by 76
  5. 2020A Survey of Algorithms for Black-Box Safety Validation of Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 71
  6. 2019Adaptive Stress Testing for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 70
  7. 2017Dynamic Occupancy Grid Prediction for Urban Autonomous Driving: A Deep Learning Approach with Fully Automatic Labelingcited by 30
  8. 2019Dynamic Environment Prediction in Urban Scenes using Recurrent Representation Learningcited by 18
  9. 2016A Random Finite Set Approach for Dynamic Occupancy Grid Maps with Real-Time Applicationcited by 17
  10. 2018Falsification of Cyber-Physical Systems Using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  11. 2019Efficient Autonomy Validation in Simulation with Adaptive Stress Testingcited by 13
  12. 2020Adaptive Stress Testing without Domain Heuristics using Go-Explorecited by 6
1 more
  1. 2020The Adaptive Stress Testing Formulationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

7 papers.