Gaussian Process Upper Confidence Bound Achieves Nearly-Optimal Regret in Noise-Free Gaussian Process Bandits
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the noise-free Gaussian Process (GP) bandits problem, in which the learner seeks to minimize regret through noise-free observations of the black-box objective function lying on the known reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). Gaussian process upper confidence bound (GP-UCB) is the well-known GP-bandits algorithm whose query points are adaptively chosen based on the GP-based upper confidence bound score. Although several existing works have reported the practical success of GP-UCB, the current theoretical results indicate its suboptimal performance. However, GP-UCB tends to perform well empirically compared with other nearly optimal noise-free algorithms that rely on a non-adaptive sampling scheme of query points. This paper resolves this gap between theoretical and empirical performance by showing the nearly optimal regret upper bound of noise-free GP-UCB. Specifically, our analysis shows the first constant cumulative regret in the noise-free settings for the squared exponential kernel and Mat'ern kernel with some degree of smoothness.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2025.
Builds on
25 of 41 references.
References · 25
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2017On Kernelized Multi-armed Banditscited by 352
- 2013Learning to Optimize Via Posterior Samplingcited by 256
- 2018Gaussian Processes and Kernel Methods: A Review on Connections and Equivalencescited by 192
- 2013Finite-Time Analysis of Kernelised Contextual Banditscited by 177
- 2014Learning to Optimize via Information-Directed Samplingcited by 168
- 2020On Information Gain and Regret Bounds in Gaussian Process Banditscited by 158
- 2017Lower Bounds on Regret for Noisy Gaussian Process Bandit Optimizationcited by 78
- 2018Adversarially Robust Optimization with Gaussian Processescited by 62
- 2021Gaussian Process Bandit Optimization with Few Batchescited by 57
- 2021Optimal Order Simple Regret for Gaussian Process Banditscited by 54
- 2021Neural Contextual Bandits without Regretcited by 40
13 more
- 2020A Domain-Shrinking based Bayesian Optimization Algorithm with Order-Optimal Regret Performancecited by 39
- 2021Uniform Generalization Bounds for Overparameterized Neural Networkscited by 21
- 2018Tight Regret Bounds for Bayesian Optimization in One Dimensioncited by 20
- 2023Random Exploration in Bayesian Optimization: Order-Optimal Regret and Computational Efficiencycited by 17
- 2025Improved Regret Analysis in Gaussian Process Bandits: Optimality for Noiseless Reward, RKHS norm, and Non-Stationary Variancecited by 15
- 2020Regret Bounds for Noise-Free Kernel-Based Banditscited by 11
- 2022A Robust Phased Elimination Algorithm for Corruption-Tolerant Gaussian Process Banditscited by 11
- 2022Graph Neural Network Banditscited by 10
- 2019Efficient Batch Black-box Optimization with Deterministic Regret Boundscited by 8
- 2024Enhancing Gaussian Process Surrogates for Optimization and Posterior Approximation via Random Explorationcited by 8
- 2024Tighter Confidence Bounds for Sequential Kernel Regressioncited by 8
- 2024Near-Optimal Algorithm for Non-Stationary Kernelized Banditscited by 8
- 2022Regret Bounds for Noise-Free Cascaded Kernelized Banditscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 8.
9 papers.
- 2026Tighter Regret Lower Bound for Gaussian Process Bandits with Squared Exponential Kernel in Hyperspherecited by 4
- 2026On Regret Bounds of Thompson Sampling for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 3
- 2025Convergence Rates of Constrained Expected Improvementcited by 2
- 2026Randomized Kriging Believer for Parallel Bayesian Optimization with Regret Boundscited by 2
- 2026Nearly-Optimal Algorithm for Adversarial Kernelized Banditscited by 1
- 2026Simple-regret rates and minimax optimality of fixed-prior expected improvement in Mat'ern and squared-exponential RKHSscited by 1
- 2026Improved Regret Analysis for Parallel Gaussian Process Bandit Optimizationcited by 1
- 2026Learning to Attack: A Bandit Approach to Adversarial Context Poisoningcited by 0
- 2026Towards Regret Guarantees for One-Step Lookahead Bayesian Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Improved Regret Analysis for Parallel Gaussian Process Bandit Optimization17 Aug 2026
- 2026Simple-regret rates and minimax optimality of fixed-prior expected improvement in Mat'ern and squared-exponential RKHSs31 Jul 2026
- 2026Towards Regret Guarantees for One-Step Lookahead Bayesian Optimization31 May 2026
- 2026Nearly-Optimal Algorithm for Adversarial Kernelized Bandits11 May 2026
- 2026On Regret Bounds of Thompson Sampling for Bayesian Optimization10 Mar 2026
- 2026Randomized Kriging Believer for Parallel Bayesian Optimization with Regret Bounds2 Mar 2026
- 2026Learning to Attack: A Bandit Approach to Adversarial Context Poisoning28 Feb 2026
- 2026Tighter Regret Lower Bound for Gaussian Process Bandits with Squared Exponential Kernel in Hypersphere20 Feb 2026
- 2025Convergence Rates of Constrained Expected Improvement16 May 2025