Tighter Confidence Bounds for Sequential Kernel Regression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Confidence bounds are an essential tool for rigorously quantifying the uncertainty of predictions. They are a core component in many sequential learning and decision-making algorithms, with tighter confidence bounds giving rise to algorithms with better empirical performance and better performance guarantees. In this work, we use martingale tail inequalities to establish new confidence bounds for sequential kernel regression. Our confidence bounds can be computed by solving a conic program, although this bare version quickly becomes impractical, because the number of variables grows with the sample size. However, we show that the dual of this conic program allows us to efficiently compute tight confidence bounds. We prove that our new confidence bounds are always tighter than existing ones in this setting. We apply our confidence bounds to kernel bandit problems, and we find that when our confidence bounds replace existing ones, the KernelUCB (GP-UCB) algorithm has better empirical performance, a matching worst-case performance guarantee and comparable computational cost.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2024.
Builds on
27 of 47 references.
References · 27
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
- 2016CVXPY: A Python-Embedded Modeling Language for Convex Optimizationcited by 633
- 2019Differentiable Convex Optimization Layerscited by 458
- 2017On Kernelized Multi-armed Banditscited by 348
- 2017Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guaranteescited by 347
- 2021Efficient and Modular Implicit Differentiationcited by 199
- 2013Finite-Time Analysis of Kernelised Contextual Banditscited by 177
- 2020On Information Gain and Regret Bounds in Gaussian Process Banditscited by 156
- 2013lil' UCB : An Optimal Exploration Algorithm for Multi-Armed Banditscited by 148
- 2020Information Theoretic Regret Bounds for Online Nonlinear Controlcited by 87
- 2021Gaussian Process Bandit Optimization with Few Batchescited by 57
- 2020Bandit optimisation of functions in the Mat'ern kernel RKHScited by 40
15 more
- 2018Approximation beats concentration? An approximation view on inference with smooth radial kernelscited by 33
- 2023On the Sublinear Regret of GP-UCBcited by 25
- 2023Improved Regret Bounds of (Multinomial) Logistic Bandits via Regret-to-Confidence-Set Conversioncited by 24
- 2023Kernelized Reinforcement Learning with Order Optimal Regret Boundscited by 20
- 2023Random Exploration in Bayesian Optimization: Order-Optimal Regret and Computational Efficiencycited by 16
- 2017Streaming kernel regression with provably adaptive mean, variance, and regularizationcited by 15
- 2021Robust Uncertainty Bounds in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces: A Convex Optimization Approachcited by 14
- 2023Exploration via linearly perturbed loss minimisationcited by 13
- 2020Uncertainty quantification using martingales for misspecified Gaussian processescited by 12
- 2022Norm-Agnostic Linear Banditscited by 12
- 2023Improved Algorithms for Stochastic Linear Bandits Using Tail Bounds for Martingale Mixturescited by 12
- 2020Regret Bounds for Noise-Free Kernel-Based Banditscited by 11
- 2023Likelihood Ratio Confidence Sets for Sequential Decision Makingcited by 10
- 2020Differentiable Implicit Layerscited by 6
- 2022Provably Efficient Kernelized Q-Learningcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2025Improved Regret Analysis in Gaussian Process Bandits: Optimality for Noiseless Reward, RKHS norm, and Non-Stationary Variancecited by 12
- 2025Gaussian Process Upper Confidence Bound Achieves Nearly-Optimal Regret in Noise-Free Gaussian Process Banditscited by 9
- 2025Confidence Sequences for Generalized Linear Models via Regret Analysiscited by 9
- 2025Vector-valued self-normalized concentration inequalities beyond sub-Gaussianitycited by 4
- 2026On Regret Bounds of Thompson Sampling for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 2
- 2026Principled Confidence Estimation for Deep Computed Tomographycited by 1
- 2026Improved Regret Analysis for Parallel Gaussian Process Bandit Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Improved Regret Analysis for Parallel Gaussian Process Bandit Optimization17 Aug 2026
- 2026On Regret Bounds of Thompson Sampling for Bayesian Optimization10 Mar 2026
- 2026Principled Confidence Estimation for Deep Computed Tomography5 Feb 2026
- 2025Vector-valued self-normalized concentration inequalities beyond sub-Gaussianity5 Nov 2025
- 2025Confidence Sequences for Generalized Linear Models via Regret Analysis23 Apr 2025
- 2025Gaussian Process Upper Confidence Bound Achieves Nearly-Optimal Regret in Noise-Free Gaussian Process Bandits26 Feb 2025
- 2025Improved Regret Analysis in Gaussian Process Bandits: Optimality for Noiseless Reward, RKHS norm, and Non-Stationary Variance10 Feb 2025